The Accused

Jeffrey Archer’s latest play, The Accused, is a tense courtroom drama with a difference. The audience will act as the jury, as if they were in the Central Criminal Court at the Old Bailey.

You will have to decide …

Did Dr Sherwood murder his wife?

Was Jennifer Mitchell his mistress?

Which of his alibis should you believe?

The choice will keep you on the edge of your seats, and at the end of the trial you will be invited to deliver your verdict of guilty or not guilty. Once you have made that decision, the play will continue - with one of two different endings, depending on your verdict. Only then will you finally discover the truth.

Jeffrey Archer is one of Britain’s top-selling novelists. He is published in 63 countries and 32 languages, and has international sales passing one hundred and twenty million copies. He is a former Member of Parliament and Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, and was created a Life Peer in the Queen’s Birthday Honours of 1992. He is also an amateur auctioneer, conducting some 60 charity auctions each year.

He has written ten novels, several of which have been serialised for television and radio, four sets of short stories, and three plays. His first - Beyond Reasonable Doubt, starring Frank Finlay and Wendy Craig, ran at the Queen’s Theatre, in London’s West End, for over 600 performances. His second play, Exclusive, which ran at the Strand Theatre, starred Paul Scofield, Eileen Atkins and Alec McCowen.

Jeffrey Archer is now working on his eleventh novel, Serendipity, which will be published in May 2002.

By the same author

Novels

Not a Penny More Not a Penny Less

Shall We Tell the President?

Kane and Abel

The Prodigal Daughter

First Among Equals

A Matter of Honour

As the Crow Flies

Honour Among Thieves

The Fourth Estate

The Eleventh Commandment

Short stories

A Quiver Full of Arrows

A Twist in the Tale

Twelve Red Herrings

The Collected Short Stories

To Cut a Long Story Short

Plays

Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Exclusive

The Accused

by

Jeffrey Archer

Contents

Act One

Scene One

Scene Two

Act Two

Scene One

Act Three

Scene One

Scene Two

The Accused

The Accused was presented by Lee Menzies at the Theatre Royal, Haymarket, London, on 5 December 2000, having received its world premiere performance at the Theatre Royal, Windsor, on 26 September 2000.

The cast was as follows (in order of appearance)

Jury Baliff

Edward de Souza

Anthony Kersley QC

Michael Feast

Alison Ashton

Janet Wantling

Sir James Barrington QC

Edward Petherbridge

Andrew Jarvis

Dominic Kemp

Court Usher

Neil France

Mr Justice Cartwright

Tony Britton

Patrick Sherwood

Jeffrey Archer

Guard

Richard Hodder

Detective Chief Inspector Payne

Douglas Fielding

Albert Webster

David Weston

Masood Hussein

Madhav Sharma

Professor Alistair Forsyth

David Collings

Jennifer Mitchell

Emma Davies

Foreman of the Jury

The voice of Ken

Livingstone

Second Guard

Gary laylor

All the action takes place in Court Number One at the Old Bailey.

Time: the present day.

Director

Val May

Designer

Simon Higlett

Lighting Designer

Vince Herbert

Sound Designer

Frank Bradley

Company Stage Manager

Debbie Cronshaw

Deputy Stage Manager

Jane Allen

Assistant Stage Managers

Angharad Watson,

Rebecca Kilgariff,

Nathalie Hobday

Act One

Scene One

The Jury Room, Central Criminal Court, the Old Bailey. Morning.

When the audience take their seats, there is no curtain. The stage is dark, but at the front is a door marked JURY ROOM. On the wall is a clock showing 9.45 a.m. When the house lights go down, the door opens and the Jury Bailiff steps through it and addresses the audience.

Jury Bailiff Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. Welcome to the Old Bailey. My name is Gilbert Pierce and I have been appointed your jury bailiff. You have been summoned this day to appear at the Central Criminal Court. The trial you have been selected for is the Crown versus Mr Patrick Sherwood. Mr Sherwood is charged with murder. In a few moments I will take you through to Court Number One. But as I suspect this is the first time you’ve been called on to give jury service, you may well have some questions, and as this is my one hundred and fourteenth murder, I may just have some of the answers.

Now the judge in this case is Mr Justice Cartwright who considers himself to be the natural successor to Judge Jeffreys and his views on the restoration of the death penalty are well documented. However, you will be relieved to learn that he’s considerate with jurors, but uncompromising when it comes to barristers - especially those who try to take advantage of him. And while I’m on the subject of barristers, both the Crown and the Defence in this case are represented by two of the best - and they both know it.

Sir James Barrington leads for the Defence, while Mr Anthony Kersley, a former Member of Parliament, appears for the Crown. If you sense any friction between them, don’t be surprised: they loathe each other. It’s no secret that Sir James defeated Mr Kersley by one vote to become Chairman of the Bar Council, and was awarded the knighthood that goes with it. It’s also common knowledge that they haven’t exchanged a civil word since.

The spotlight falls on Kersley and his junior, Ashton, who are moving towards the courtroom in a corridor of light.

Ashton I see we’re up against your old sparring partner.

Kersley Are you referring to Barrington, or His Lordship Mr Justice Cartwright?

Ashton I thought you and Sir James …

Kersley Frankly I’ve never cared for either of them, and I can assure you the feeling is mutual. You see, I didn’t go to the right school, old boy.

The attention moms to Barrington and Jarvis.

Jarvis Have you appeared before Mr Justice Cartwright before?

Barrington Many times, and on this occasion we start with a home advantage.

Jarvis Why’s that?

Barrington Because he disapproves of Kersley almost as much as I do, so all we have to do is massage the old boy’s ego.

Jarvis But surely Kersley will do exactly the same thing?

Barrington Not a chance. He’ll pick a quarrel with Cartwright at the first possible opportunity - he believes in the old adage that a good row with the judge makes up for a weak case.

Jury Bailiff looks up from his clipboard.

Jury Bailiff Once Mr Kersley has made his opening statement for the Crown, he will proceed to call his witnesses. At the moment there are five on the list, but I’m not expecting to get through all of them today. After the adjournment you may return home, when you will quickly discover that friends and relatives will want to discuss your views on the case and will be only too willing to offer theirs. But unlike you, they will not have heard all the evidence, so their opinions are, at best, worthless and, at worst, injurious. The safest bet is don’t talk to anyone and don’t allow anyone to talk to you

Usher Mr Pierce, I am instructed by His Lordship to ask if the jury are assembled and ready?

Jury Bailiff They are all in attendance, Mr Usher.

Usher Then will you please accompany the jury to the courtroom?

Jury Bailiff (bows, and the Usher returns the bow. Jury Bailiff turns back to face the audience) Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, please follow me.

Kersley and Ashton walk through the jury door towards the courtroom in a corridor of light.

Ashton Do you think in the twenty-first century anyone gives a damn which school you went to?

Kersley Mr Justice Cartwright doesn’t belong in the twenty-first century - as you’re about to find out - which may even work to our advantage.

Ashton What do you mean?

Kersley Simply that if the jury considers the judge is favouring one side, they quite often react against it.

Ashton I can’t believe he’ll make it that obvious.

Kersley Then I’ll have to make sure he does.

Barrington and Jarvis follow in the corridor of light.

Barrington Andrew, have you had a chance to speak to our client this morning?

Jarvis Yes, when I left him he was pacing up and down his cell and feeling rather sorry for himself. (Pauses.) I have to admit I rather like him.

Barrington After thirty years in this game Andrew, I can tell you that murderers are a far nicer class of person - it’s the barristers you have to watch out for.

Jarvis (laughs) Are you referring to Mr Kersley, by any chance?

Barrington I never refer to Kersley if I can avoid it. However, don’t lower your guard even for a moment, because when it comes to punching, no one has explained to Kersley where the belt is.

As Barrington enters the courtroom, the two QCs come face to face for the first time. They give each other a cursory nod. A few moments later there is a triple knock on the outside of the door.

Usher Be upstanding in the court. All persons having anything to do before my Lords, the Queen’s Justices, oyer and terminer, and general gaol delivery for the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, draw near and give your attendance. God save the Queen.

Mr Justice Cartwright enters and takes his place in the centre of the bench. All bow. The Judge returns their bow.

Usher Bring up the prisoner.

Sherwood steps into the dock, and the Jury Bailiff walks across to stand in front of him.

Jury Bailiff Is your name Patrick Hugh Sherwood?

Sherwood Yes.

Jury Bailiff Patrick Sherwood, you stand charged with murder. The particulars of the offence are that, on the twenty-first of March 1999 in the county of London, you administered a fatal dose of poison to your wife, Elizabeth Sherwood. How say you - Guilty or Not Guilty?

Sherwood Not guilty.

Jury Bailiff (walks to the front of the stage, faces the audience and bows) Members of the Jury, the defendant stands before you charged with one count - that of murder. To this count he has pleaded Not Guilty. By his plea he has cast himself upon his country, which country ye are. Your charge, therefore, is to hearken unto the evidence and say whether he be guilty or no. (He turns his attention away from the audience and returns to his place.)

Judge Members of the Jury, you have sworn to try this case on the evidence. You must therefore give heed only to what takes place in this court and ignore anything you have read in the press. Mr Kersley, you may proceed with the prosecution.

Kersley May it please Your Lordship, Members of the Jury. The murder of Elizabeth Sherwood was a crime planned by a man with a brilliant and subtle mind, who set out to dupe his colleagues, so that when his wife died, no one would suspect him of being involved in such an evil enterprise.

But unfortunately for him, even the cleverest of murderers make mistakes which, like pieces in a jigsaw, end up revealing the true picture.

The Crown will produce five pieces of that jigsaw, which will show the lengths to which Mr Sherwood was willing to go in order to cover his tracks. Once those five pieces are in. place, I believe you will come to one conclusion: that Mr Patrick Sherwood is guilty of murder.

My Lord, we call our first witness, Chief Inspector Payne.

Usher Call Chief Inspector Payne.

Guard Chief Inspector Payne.

The Usher stands and announces Chief Inspector Payne, as he will do for all ather witnesses from the lobby outside the double doors. He then shuts the door and returns to his seat. The Chief Inspector enters and takes his place in the witness box. Whenever witnesses speak, they should face the jury - the audience.

Usher Take the testament in your right hand and read from the card.

Payne I swear by Almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Kersley Is your name Alan Payne and are you a Detective Chief Inspector with the Central Area major incident team?

Payne Yes, I am, sir.

Kersley Chief Inspector, can you tell the court how you became involved in this case.

Payne (Checks his notebook and faces the Judge.) May I refer to my notebook, My Lord?

Judge (nods) You may, Chief Inspector.

Payne On the evening of March the twenty-first 1999 we received an emergency call at Wimbledon police station, from a Mr Albert Webster, the porter of a block of flats in the division. He informed us that he thought a burglary had taken place and, as there had been several in the area recently, we immediately went round to Arcadia Mansions to investigate.

Kersley And what did you find when you arrived at the Sherwoods’ flat?

Payne I found Mrs Sherwood lying on the floor, covered in a blanket. She was sobbing and holding up her right arm, which appeared to be badly bruised. I assumed that she must have taken an intruder by surprise, but when I asked her what had happened she was incoherent. She kept pointing to a glass of wine on a side table. A few moments later an ambulance crew arrived and after they had examined her, told me that she must be taken into hospital immediately.

Kersley Did you follow the ambulance to St George’s?

Payne No, my first priority was to take a statement from the porter before checking over the flat.

Kersley And once you had done that, were you still of the opinion that a burglary had taken place?

Payne No, I was puzzled. There was clearly evidence of a struggle, but I could find no sign of a forced entry. All the locks and windows were intact, with the exception of a kitchen window, which led on to the fire escape and was slightly open. No drawers appeared to have been left open, which is what one would expect if a burglary had taken place.

Kersley Did anything else arouse your suspicions?

Payne A rubber glove that had been dropped on the kitchen floor, and I was also curious about the glass of wine Mrs Sherwood had been pointing to, so I instructed forensics to have the glove and the wineglass sent to the lab for testing.

Kersley Did you then go to the hospital?

Payne Yes, as I hoped Mrs Sherwood might have recovered sufficiently to answer some questions.

Kersley And was she able to do so?

Payne No, she died a few minutes after I arrived at St George’s.

Kersley And the cause of death, Chief Inspector? How was it entered on the death certificate?

Payne Congestive cardiac failure, but as Mrs Sherwood had suffered in the past from (Checks his notebook.) atherosclerosis, her heart attack was not considered to be suspicious.

Barrington My Lord, I apologise for interrupting, I simply wish to seek your guidance.

Judge (suspiciously) Yes, I’m listening, Sir James.

Barrington Is the Chief Inspector a qualified medical practitioner? Because if he isn’t, perhaps we could dispense with his medical opinions and stick to the facts in this case.

Judge You were not seeking my guidance, Sir James, but simply wishing to make a point. No doubt you feel you have. Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Thank you, My Lord. Chief Inspector, you were telling the court, before we were interrupted by my learned friend, that you went to the hospital in the hope of asking Mrs Sherwood some questions. When you arrived, did you find Mrs Sherwood in her husband’s arms?

Judge (Barrington rises) Mr Kersley, that was an outrageous leading question whose only purpose was to prejudice the jury.

Kersley I do apologise, My Lord. I must have been distracted by Sir James’s unnecessary interruption. Chief Inspector, when you arrived at the hospital, was Mr Sherwood at his wife’s bedside?

Payne No, sir, a member of the hospital staff was trying to locate him.

Kersley I see. So who signed the death certificate?

Payne Her local GP, a Dr Haslam.

Kersley And was he satisfied that Mrs Sherwood had suffered a heart attack?

Payne He had no reason to believe otherwise. He’d been treating her for a heart condition for some time.

Barrington My Lord, he is at it again.

Judge And so are you, Sir James. Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Did you also accept this judgement?

Payne I saw no reason to question their professional opinion.

Kersley So what caused you to change your mind and open a murder inquiry?

Payne Some weeks later I received a call from the dangerous drugs division of the Home Office. Following that call, I visited a chemist in Wellingborough to check their Controlled Drugs Register. It showed that a Mr Sherwood had been regularly having prescriptions of Potassium Chloride made up, that fell into the category of poisons under the 1994 Drug Trafficking Act.

Kersley Why should that make you consider a crime had been committed? After all, Mr Sherwood has the authority to write out such prescriptions.

Payne Yes, but why have them made up outside London when St George’s Hospital has a large pharmacy of its own?

Kersley Why indeed, and did Mr Sherwood collect these prescriptions himself?

Payne No, over a period of three months he used a Ms Jennifer Mitchell, a junior staff nurse at St George’s, to collect them on a Saturday in Wellingborough and then return the ampoules of Potassium to Mr Sherwood’s office on the Monday morning.

Kersley Chief Inspector, would I be correct in saying that if Ms Mitchell had not volunteered a statement, you would never have considered charging the defendant?

Payne That is correct. Her evidence was to prove vital. She stated that over a period of twelve weeks, between January and March of 1999, Mr Sherwood had instructed her on six occasions to pick up ten-millilitre ampoules of Potassium Chloride. But he only handed her the prescriptions on a Friday evening, when he knew she would be visiting her parents in Wellingborough.

Judge Wellingborough keeps cropping up, Chief Inspector. Does it have some particular significance in this case?

Kersley Wellingborough has no relevance in itself, My Lord. All Mr Sherwood needed was for the prescriptions to be dispensed at a chemist outside London, so that none of his colleagues at St George’s would be aware of what he was really up to.

Judge Ah, so it could well have been Milton Keynes or Henley?

Kersley Yes, My Lord, but only if Ms Mitchell had lived in Milton Keynes or Henley.

Judge Ah, yes, I see. Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Chief Inspector, were any of these prescriptions for Potassium Chloride made out for Mrs Sherwood?

Payne No, they were all prescribed for his private patients.

Kersley So what made you think that they might not have reached those patients?

Payne When the results of the lab test came back, they showed that there were traces of Potassium Chloride on the rubber glove found on the Sherwoods’ kitchen floor.

Kersley On the glove, I see … and did the lab tests reveal anything else of significance?

Payne Yes, the glass of wine found on the table by Mrs Sherwood’s side contained thirty millilitres of Temazepam, which is three times the recommended dosage.

Kersley And did you identify any fingerprints on that glass?

Payne Yes, Mrs Sherwood’s.

Kersley But did you also check the fingerprints on the wine bottle?

Payne Yes, I did, and we could only find Mr Sherwood’s.

Kersley Only Mr Sherwood’s. But what about the rest of the flat?

Payne The only other fingerprints identifiable were those of the porter, Albert Webster.

Kersley So there was no reason to believe there had ever been an intruder?

Payne None that we could discover, sir.

Kersley Once you had gathered all your evidence, what did you do next?

Payne I obtained a warrant for the arrest of Patrick Sherwood, which I executed on June the ninth at St George’s Hospital. I cautioned him, and then charged him with the murder of his wife, Elizabeth Sherwood.

Kersley Thank you, Chief Inspector. No more questions, My Lord.

Judge Sir James, do you wish to cross-examine the Chief Inspector?

Barrington I most certainly do, My Lord. Chief Inspector, I must begin by asking you if it is usual to open a full murder inquiry on information supplied by one young woman.

Payne No, but…

Barrington No buts, Chief Inspector, it was a simple enough question and the answer was no. My next question is equally simple. The bruises on Mrs Sherwood’s arm. Surely the most likely explanation is that they resulted from a struggle with an intruder? You told us there had been several burglaries in the area recently.

Payne I could find no evidence of a burglary, sir.

Barrington Chief Inspector, is it common for burglars to leave their fingerprints all over the place, hoping you will find them?

Payne No, but.,.

Barrington I thought we’d agreed on no buts, Chief Inspector, Can I also confirm, that it was you who discovered the kitchen window open?

Payne Someone had unlatched it from the inside.

Barrington It hardly matters who unlatched it, Chief Inspector, only who might have used it as a means of entry, and I do hope you’re not going to suggest that Mr Sherwood entered his own flat by the fire escape, when he could so easily have walked in through the front door.

Payne Unless he had a reason for not wanting to be seen walking in through the front door.

Barrington And on that flimsy supposition you decided to charge Mr Sherwood with murder?

Payne No, that decision was made by the Crown Prosecution Service after they had considered all the evidence.

Barrington I see. So let me finally ask you, Chief Inspector, when you charged Mr Sherwood, did he make any statement?

Payne Yes. (Checks his notebook.) He said, ‘This is ridiculous. I adored my wife; someone must have been feeding you with false information’.

Barrington Someone must have been feeding you with false information. Now, I wonder who that can have been? No further questions, My Lord. (He resumes his seat.)

Judge Do you wish to re-examine, Mr Kersley?

Kersley (rises slightly) No, thank you, My Lord.

Judge Thank you, Chief Inspector. You may leave the witness box. (The Chief Inspector leaves the witness box and the courtroom.) Perhaps you’d like to call your next witness, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Yes, My Lord. I call Mr Albert Webster.

Usher Call Mr Albert Webster.

Guard Mr Albert Webster.

Webster is a man aged between forty-five and fifty. He is wearing a T-shirt and a well-worn suit. He enters the courtroom, baking lost, and the Usher has to guide him to the witness box.

Usher This way, sir. Please take the testament in you right hand and read from the card.

Webster I never bothered with the reading.

Usher Then repeat after me, I swear by Almighty God.

Webster I swears by Almigh’y God.

Usher That the evidence I shall give.

Webster That the evidence I shall give.

Usher Shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Webster Shall be the truth, the ’ole truth and nothin’ but the truth. (He stares at the Judge.)

Judge Mr Webster, there’s no need to address your remarks to me. It is the jury who will want to hear all your evidence.

Kersley Is your name Albert Philip Webster?

Webster You got it, mate.

Kersley And where do you live?

Webster Arcadia Mansions, Arcadia Road, Wimbledon.

Kersley And what is your occupation?

Webster I’m the resident porter - ‘ave been for the past twelve years, ‘aven’t I, ever since I came out of the army.

Kersley Mr Webster, can you tell the court why the late evening of March twenty-first 1999 is etched on your memory?

Webster I dunno if it’s etched on me memory, but I won’t never forge’ it.

Kersley So please tell the court what happened that night, Mr Webster.

Webster It must ’ave been around ’alf past ten, ’cos that’s when I goes on me night round ’fore turnin’ in. Always starts at the top of the building and works down to the bottom, where I live. It’s only logic, innit? When I reached the landin’ of the sixth that night, I ’eard noises comin’ from the floor below.

Kersley Can you describe those noises?

Webster Yes, it was as if someone was ’avin a row, and then I ’eard a crash - like a chair turnin’ over.

Kersley A row? Could it have been a quarrel between a man and his wife?

Barrington (rises) My Lord, how can Mr Webster possibly know the answer to that question?

Webster Cos I ’eard voices.

Judge Voices? Can you be certain, Mr Webster, that you heard more than one voice coming from the flat?

Webster No, I can’t be certain, but why would Mrs Sherwood want to shout at ’erself?

Kersley Why indeed. And did you hear anything she said?

Webster Yes, I’m pretty sure I ’eard ’er say ‘ ’ow did you get in?’.

Kersley ‘How did you get in.’ And did she sound surprised?

Webster Too bloody right she did.

Judge Moderate your language in my court, Mr Webster.

Webster Sorry, Guv.

Judge You address me as My Lord, and counsel as Sir.

Webster (looking directly at the Judge) Right you are, sir. (He turns his attention back to Kersley.)

Kersley Had you been inside Mrs Sherwood’s flat before?

Webster Oh, yes, when I gets to ’er floor, she’d often ask me in for a cup’a tea, I think she liked the company.

Kersley But wasn’t Mr Sherwood around most evenings?

Webster No, not regular. In any case, I wouldn’t ’ave gone in if he was around, not after that time he came back unexpected and told me to bugger off. (Judge and Webster look at each other.)

Kersley And how often did Mr Sherwood go out in the evenings?

Webster Quite a lot. What with his private patients and so on.

Kersley How did you know that he was going out to see one of his private patients?

Webster I used to watch ’im leavin’ from my flat in the basement, didn’t I.

Kersley Yes, I’m sure you did, but that doesn’t explain how you knew that he was visiting a patient?

Webster Common sense, inn’t (He touches his nose.) Whenever he was visitin’ a patient, he’d take his doctor’s bag with him, wouldn’t he.

Kersley And was he carrying his doctor’s bag that night?

Webster No, he wasn’t.

Kersley What time was it when he left the building?

Webster It must ’ave bin a few minutes after seven.

Kersley How can you be so sure?

Webster Cos I’d just come out of the lavatory, ’adn’t I. (Kersley looks puzzled.) I phones me ol’ mum at six, tea at ’alf past, go to the toilet at seven, Coronation Street at seven thirty - regular as clockwork. Old army training, innit.

Kersley And when did Mr Sherwood return that night?

Webster No idea, Guv, but it can’t ’ave been before eleven could it, cos he wasn’t there when they carted his wife off to ’ospital.

Kersley Quite. So when you heard the row, what did you do next?

Webster I ran down the stairs, fast as I could. I bangs on the door, but no one answers.

Kersley Was that when you called the police?

Webster No, Guv, I decided this ’ad to be one of them emergencies, where I’m expected to use me master key. In the Pioneer Corps it’s what we used to call initiative.

Webster holds up a bunch of keys, showing one in particular, and waits while everyone hangs on his words.

Kersley But you told the judge that before you unlocked the door, you had heard more than one voice coming from the flat?

Webster Yes, I’m pretty (He hesitates.) sure about that.

Kersley Could one of those voices have been Mr Sherwood’s?

Webster Doesn’t seem likely on account of the fact that he’d already gone out.

Kersley But could he have returned without you seeing him?

Webster Only if he used the fire escape.

Kersley Well, that would certainly explain Mrs Sherwood’s words, ’How did you get in?’ So, Mr Webster, when you unlocked the door, what did you find?

Webster Some furniture had been knocked over and Mrs Sherwood was lyin’ on the floor moanin’.

Kersley And was she on her own?

Webster Yes, as far as I could tell.

Judge What do you mean, Mr Webster, by ’as far as I could tell’?

Webster Cos the door on the far side of the room slammed shut the minute I walked in, didn’t it. (Judge makes a note.)

Kersley Slammed shut the minute you walked in - as if someone had hurriedly pulled it closed?

Webster Yes, you got the idea.

Kersley So what did you do next? (Barrington nods.)

Webster I dials 999 and tells ’em to send round an ambulance an’ the police sharpish, an’ then I gets a blanket and covers ’er up.

Kersley Did she give any reason why the furniture had been knocked over?

Webster No, she was just lying there, moanin’ and rubbin’ ’er arm what was bruised, so I offered ’er the glass of wine that was on the table ’opin it would ’elp, but she just pushed it away, and then she began cryin’ even louder. So I wondered if someone ’ad put somethin’ in the wine that had made her ill.

Barrington (rises) My Lord …

Judge Yes, yes, Sir James. (Faces the audience.) Members of the Jury, you should ignore that comment - it is nothing more than speculation. Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley No more questions, My Lord. I think the jury has taken the point.

Webster starts to leave the witness box.

Judge Mr Webster, please remain in the box for a moment, as I have a feeling that Sir James might want to ask you a question or two.

Barrington You are quite right, My Lord. Mr Webster, may I begin by congratulating you on your remarkable memory.

Webster Thank you, Guv. I s’pose you can put it down to my army trainin’.

Barrington Quite so, but even I was puzzled, Mr Webster, as to how you could be so sure that when Mr Sherwood left the building, on the night in question, he was not carrying his doctor’s bag. (Kersley smiles.)

Webster To be honest, Guv, I wasn’t sure at the time.

Barrington You weren’t sure at the time, but you stated categorically…

Webster No, I wasn’t categoric, not until I phoned for the ambulance.

Barrington Not until you phoned for the ambulance. I’m not altogether certain I’m following you, Mr Webster.

Webster Well, you see, that’s when I first saw the doctor’s bag. He’d left it on the table by the phone, so he couldn’t ’ave taken it wiv ’im, could he?

Barrington I see. Mr Webster you told the court that you thought someone else might have been in the room when you first unlocked the door to the apartment.

Webster Yeah, I did.

Barrington And your immediate reaction when you saw the overturned furniture was that it must have been a burglar whom Mrs Sherwood had been shouting at?

Webster Yes, cos there ’ave been a lot of break-ins durin’ the past year, aven’t there?

Barrington Have there? Now, Mr Webster, remembering what a good memory you have, is it possible you can tell the court when you heard the sentence ’How did you get in?’. Was it before you unlocked the door, as you opened the door, or after you had entered the room?

Webster Before I unlocked the door.

Barrington So, some time before you stepped into the room?

Webster (hesitates) Yes, I think so.

Barrington When you walked in, you told my learned friend that you saw the door on the far side of the room slam shut?

Webster Yeah, I did.

Barrington Could it have been the wind?

Webster I s’pose so.

Barrington Did you check to see if anyone was hiding in the kitchen?

Webster No. Why should I?

Barrington Because it leads to the kitchen window and fire escape.

Kersley My Lord, I am enthralled by Sir James’s gift for storytelling and indeed I would go as far as to suggest that were he to submit this particular scenario to the BBC they might well consider it for A Book at Bedtime. But I’m bound to ask what it has to do with the case now being tried before Your Lordship?

Barrington It goes to the very heart of this case, My Lord, because the Prosecution are claiming that the defendant poisoned his wife, when there is no evidence to show that he was even in the building when she collapsed. It now seems there is a distinct possibility that someone else was and therefore the police could well have arrested the wrong person.

Judge Ingenious, Sir James. But I do feel the jury might require a little more proof of the existence of your phantom intruder.

Barrington You may even see them in the witness box, My Lord …

Kersley (leaps up) Is Sir James suggesting that it was Mr Webster who murdered Mrs Sherwood?

Webster Are you accusin’ me?

Barrington If Mr Kersley had allowed me to finish my sentence, I would have added ‘before this trial is over’. No further questions, My Lord.

Webster I did hear her say ‘ ’ow did you get in?’.

Judge Do you wish to re-examine, Mr Kersley?

Kersley No, thank you, My Lord.

Webster I wasn’t tellin’ no porkies.

Judge You may leave the box now, Mr Webster.

Webster And I did see the door slam. (Remains in the witness box.)

Judge Mr Webster, will you please leave the courtroom. (Webster reluctantly leaves.)

Webster On my mother’s life, I swear I saw it slam shut! (He walks off, aided by Guard.)

Guard This way, sir.

Webster I only told ’em what you told me to say!

The lights fade on all members of the court as Webster exits. Blackout as sound of bells is heard.

Scene Two

Later that afternoon.

When the lights come up Mr Hussein is in the witness box. He is between forty and fifty, formally dressed, and speaks with a pronounced Indian accent. The Koran should be wrapped in a cloth.

Usher How will you take the oath, Mr Hussein.

Hussein On the Koran, sir.

Usher Take the Koran in your right hand and read from the card.

Hussein I swear by Almighty Allah that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Kersley Your name is Masood Hussein, and you are the proprietor of Hussein the Chemist, 141 High Street, Wellingborough?

Hussein Yes, sir I am.

Kersley Mr Hussein, perhaps you could tell the court how you became involved in this case.

Hussein I read in one of the medical journals of the premature death of Mrs Elizabeth Sherwood. I wouldn’t have given the matter a second thought, had it not been for an accompanying photograph of the mourners attending the funeral.

Kersley Why were the mourners of any significance, Mr Hussein?

Hussein I observed a lady standing a few paces behind Mr Sherwood whom I thought I recognised. I studied her face more closely with a magnifying glass and realised I had seen her before, but couldn’t remember where.

Kersley And did you eventually remember?

Hussein Yes, it was some days later when I was making an entry in my register of poisons and came across the signature of a Ms J. Mitchell at the top of the page, and recalled that she had visited the pharmacy several times.

Kersley Can you be certain that it was the same Ms Mitchell whose photograph you saw?

Hussein Oh, yes, I checked back through the register and discovered that Ms Mitchell had called in to the pharmacy on six separate occasions during a period of three months, and always on a Saturday.

Kersley But that doesn’t prove she was the woman in the photograph?

Hussein But Mr Sherwood’s signature does.

Kersley Mr Sherwood’s signature?

Hussein Yes, he had countersigned all the prescriptions.

Kersley Had he? And what were these prescriptions made out for?

Hussein Ten millilitres of Potassium Chloride.

Kersley And did you keep ai six prescriptions?

Hussein I most certainly did, Mr Kersley. I retain all prescriptions for controlled drugs for the required period of five years.

Kersley You say you served Ms Mitchell on no fewer than six occasions. Do you recall anything in particular about her?

Hussein She was a self-confident young woman and although she knew exactly what she wanted, she appeared tense, even a little nervous.

Kersley And is that what made you suspicious?

Hussein No, I was more puzzled than suspicious, because I couldn’t work out why Mr Sherwood would want to have his prescriptions made up in my small pharmacy in Wellingborough, when St George’s has a large pharmacy of its own. From my experience, doctors want drugs immediately, not some days later.

Kersley Mr Hussein, an ampoule of Potassium Chloride was found in Mr Sherwood’s bag on the night of his wife’s death. Could it have came from your shop?

Judge How can Mr Hussein know the answer to that question?

Hussein (turning to face the Judge) My Lord, if I could see the ampoule I would be able to tell if it had come from my shop.

Judge How is that possible, Mr Hussein?

Hussein Because every dangerous drug has a number displayed on its packaging which, when it is sold, has to be entered in my poisons register.

Kersley My Lord, both the poisons register and the ampoule of Potassium found in Mr Sherwood’s bag are in the court’s possession. They are numbers eleven and twenty-six on the court’s list of exhibits. Perhaps Your Lordship would be kind enough to check the entry in the register, while I ask Mr Hussein to read out the number on the ampoule of Potassium. (Judge nods his agreement.)

Barrington My Lord, I must object. This parlour game adds nothing to the evidence. After all, the ampoule of Potassium found in Mr Sherwood’s bag was unopened so what possible bearing can it have on the case?

Judge A great deal Sir James, because if this is not one of the ampoules collected from Wellingborough, it will surely work in favour of your client, as it will show that there is no proof that the other five ever left the hospital. (Jury Bailiff hands the register up to the Bench, while the Usher hands over the ampoule of Potassium to Hussein.) Please read out the number on your package, Mr Hussein.

Hussein 107293 AZ.

Judge (nods, and faces the audience) They are identical.

Kersley So there can be no doubt that the ampoule of Potassium picked up by Ms Mitchell on March the nineteenth from Mr Hussein’s shop, was the one found in the defendant’s bag on the night of Mrs Sherwood’s death, and therefore we can assume that the other five …

Barrington My Lord, that is outrageous. We can assume nothing…

Kerlsey Other than that my learned friend will always interrupt whenever he finds his client in any real trouble. No more questions, My Lord. (Resumes his seat.)

Judge Do you wish to question this witness, Sir James?

Barrington I most certainly do, My Lord. Mr Hussein, do you keep a box of dusting powder and a brush under your shop counter?

Hussein (puzzled) No, sir, I do not.

Barrington What about a fingerprint pad?

Hussein A fingerprint pad?

Barrington A pair of handcuffs, perhaps?

Hussein Why should I do that?

Barrington Because you seem to enjoy playing the amateur detective.

Hussein I’m not sure I know what you mean, Sir James.

Barrington Then allow me to explain. You come across a photograph of Mr Sherwood in a medical journal attending his wife’s funeral With the help of a magnifying glass you spot a lady in the crowd whom you think you recognise. You discover her name in your drugs register and suddenly you’re the Sherlock Holmes of Wellingborough.

Hussein (looks puzzled) I don’t know a Mr Holmes.

Barrington You don’t?

Hussein I don’t recall him ever coming into the shop.

Barrington When did you arrive in this country, Mr Hussein?

Hussein Just over two years ago.

Barrington Only two years ago, so you’re probably still unfamiliar with our ways, not to mention our literature?

Hussein I have long been an admirer of the British, Sir James.

Barrington I feel sure you have, Mr Hussein, but that doesn’t make you British. Did you qualify in this country?

Hussein No, sir, I did not.

Barrington Then why are you allowed to dispense dangerous drugs?

Hussein Because I have been a member of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society for the past twenty years.

Barrington On what grounds, may I ask?

Hussein Because in my own country I am a qualified doctor.

Barrington But you are not in your own country, Mr Hussein, so I must ask you, do your qualifications permit you to practise, as a doctor, in this country?

Hussein No, sir, but … that is purely …

Barrington No buts, Mr Hussein. They do not permit you to practise as a doctor in this country!

Hussein Sadly, not yet.

Barrington Or perhaps not so sadly, for the patients.

Kersley My Lord, is my learned friend going to be allowed continually to insult the witness in this manner?

Judge Mr Kersley, this is a charge of murder and, within the bounds of reason, I shall allow the Defence every latitude.

Kersley Is that latitude to be extended to Sir James asking questions to which he already knows the answer?

Judge Only a foolish lawyer asks questions to which he does not know the answer, Mr Kersley. Please carry on, Sir James.

Barrington Thank you, My Lord. Mr Hussein, have you ever visited St George’s Hospital?

Hussein No, sir, though I have …

Barrington Have you ever come into contact with Mr Sherwood?

Hussein Yes, I attended a lecture he gave to the King’s Fund.

Barrington Along with how many other people, may I ask?

Hussein There must have been over a hundred people present.

Barrington I doubt if even Mr Sherlock Holmes would have gleaned enough evidence from going to a lecture, attended by over a hundred people, to conclude that the lecturer should be charged with murdering his wife. If that were sufficient evidence, you’d be claiming we’re old friends simply on the strength of this cross-examination.

Hussein I wouldn’t dream of doing so, Sir James, especially as we have met before.

Barrington And when, pray, was that?

Hussein It was just over a year ago, when you were chairman of the Bar Council and addressed the Anglo-Indian Society - of which I have the honour of being Secretary.

Barrington And how many people were present on that occasion.

Hussein Just over three hundred.

Barrington Just over three hundred.

Hussein Yes, but we did sit next to each other during dinner. At the time you left the Society in no doubt that you felt most Indians ran corner shops and you thought it amusing that you were still unable to tell one from another. However, I would not ask Sir Arthur Conan Doyle to consider that as evidence of anything.

Barrington I’m delighted that we’ve finally found something we can agree on, Mr Hussein, because convicting Mr Sherwood will depend on substantiated evidence, and not on the arm’s-length opinion of an unqualified chemist. No further questions, My Lord.

Judge Do you wish to re-examine, Mr Kersley?

Kersley Yes, thank you My Lord. I do have one question for Dr Hussein … I beg your pardon, My Lord … Mr Hussein, may I ask you why you were so willing to assist the police in their enquiries, even agreeing to appear in this case as a Crown witness?

Hussein To do one’s duty as a good citizen and respect the law is the British way, Mr Kersley. Or that’s what Sir James assured us when he delivered his lecture to the Anglo-Indian Society last year.

Kersley No more questions, My Lord.

Judge Thank you Mr Hussein, you may leave the witness box. (Hussein leaves the witness box and passes in front of Kersley.).

Kersley (aside to Hussein) Dr Hussein, you’re wasted on the medical profession - you should have joined us at the Bar.

Hussein Oh, no, Mr Kersley, I’m far too honest to make a success of your chosen profession.

Judge You may call your next witness, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Thank you, My Lord. I call Professor Alistair Forsyth.

Usher Call Alistair Forsyth.

Guard Alistair Forsyth.

Professor Forsyth is a Scot of around fifty-five to sixty, very formal and slightly pompom. He enters the courtroom and goes straight to the witness box. He takes the card in his right hand, as if he has been through the process many times before. He does not wait for the Usher to instruct him.

Forsyth I swear by Almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Kersley Professor, I would like to establish with the jury the particular expertise you bring to this case. (Forsyth nods.) You were educated at Edinburgh Academy, from where you won a scholarship to Cambridge to read medicine?

Forsyth Yes, Mr Kersley, that is correct.

Kersley At Cambridge you graduated with honours in Pharmacology and went on to do research for an MD?

Forsyth That is also correct.

Kersley On completing your MD, you took up a Fellowship at King’s College, London, where you continued your research. May I enquire what your specialist subject was?

Forsyth Toxicology, the study of poisons.

Kersley You were offered the Chair of Toxicology at London University, and you have since written several books on the subject, which are acknowledged as the recognised text for any student reading for a medical degree?

Forsyth Only three of my works are set texts, Mr Kersley. The rest of them would be far beyond the understanding of the average undergraduate.

Kersley Quite so. You are a Fellow of the Royal Society and have recently been awarded a CBE for services to medicine?

Judge I do believe, Mr Kersley, that you have established beyond peradventure the credentials of your expert witness, so perhaps the time has come to get on with the case in hand.

Kersley I am delighted to learn, My Lord, that you feel Professor Forsyth’s credentials need no further claims on my part, as I believe your endorsement can only give the jury added confidence in his opinions.

Judge (scowls) Mr Kersley. Get on with it.

Kersley First let me ask you, Professor, how you became involved in this case?

Forsyth The Crown Prosecution Service invited me to make a report on Mrs Sherwood’s medical history. I began by reading all Mrs Sherwood’s files held at St George’s.

Kersley And would I be correct in thinking that you sought a Home Office order to exhume the body?

Forsyth I would have done so, Mr Kersley, had Mr Sherwood not given instructions for the body to be cremated a few days after her death.

Kersley Really. Despite this setback, were you able to discover any new evidence?

Forsyth No, because Mr Sherwood had misled his colleagues into believing that his wife’s previous heart attack explained her premature death. They also emphasised that as she was married to a surgeon who specialised in the subject, her aftercare treatment could hardly have been better.

Kersley Or worse, as the case may be.

Judge Mr Kersley, you will in future desist from making these sotto voce remarks. (Turns to the audience.) Members of the Jury, Mr Kersley’s comment should be ignored.

Kersley But not forgotten, I suspect.

Judge Did you wish to say something, Mr Kerlsey?

Kersley My Lord, I was simply at pains to point out that …

Judge It is not your responsibility to point out anything, Mr Kersley, merely to ask questions, which may elicit answers that in turn might possibly assist the jury.

Kersley But … My Lord … if I am to discharge …

Judge No buts, Mr Kersley, as Sir James has so properly reminded us. From you, I only require questions. I expect the answers to come from the witnesses.

Kersley So be it, My Lord. Professor, would it be possible for an experienced doctor to poison a patient while at the same time fooling his colleagues?

Forsyth Yes, nowadays that would be easy enough for anyone with Mr Sherwood’s experience. There are three known poisons - only one available on prescription - that would kill an intended victim without leaving any clue that a murder had taken place.

Kersley Well, I will deal only with the one poison that is available on prescription - Potassium Chloride. Professor, could you poison someone with Potassium Chloride and hope to get away with it?

Forsyth Oh, yes, it’s the most satisfactory of all poisons for a would-be murderer. Once injected, the victim will suffer a cardiac arrest, showing absolutely no sign of being poisoned.

Kersley So what led you to suspect that this was not a death by natural causes?

Forsyth The discovery of a deposit of Potassium Chloride on the rubber glove found on the floor of the Sherwoods’ kitchen.

Kersley And how much poison was discovered on the glove?

Forsyth One milligram, which is an amount consistent with checking that a hypodermic needle was working effectively.

Kersley Would you care to demonstrate to the jury exactly what you mean by that, Professor?

Forsyth Certainly. (Pulls on a rubber glove and demonstrates to the audience.) Just before injecting a patient, you press the plunger thus, to ensure that the liquid is flowing. (He allows it to fly into the air, landing on his glove.) As you observe, some droplets end up on the glove.

Kersley And this led you to believe that Mrs Sherwood had probably received an injection of Potassium Chloride just before her death?

Forsyth Yes, it did.

Kersley And could such an injection also have caused the bruising on her arm?

Forsyth Most certainly it could, especially if she had offered any resistance.

Kersley Professor, I should now like to ask you about the glass of wine found on the table by Mrs Sherwood’s side. Have you been able to analyse its contents?

Forsyth Yes I have, and they revealed large deposits of Temazepam - a particularly strong sedative, available only on prescription. There was enough left in the glass to have knocked out a heavyweight boxer.

Kersley Which would, had she taken it, have made injecting her all the more easy.

Barrington My Lord, I was accused by my learned friend of a plot worthy of A Book at Bedtime. Following Mr Kersley’s flight of fancy, once this trial is over can I assume he will be applying to become an investigative journalist with the News of the World?

Judge We will leave the jury to decide which one they consider the better qualified for that job, Sir James. Carry on, please, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Professor, can you confirm that six ampoules of Potassium Chloride were collected by Ms Mitchell from a chemist in Wellingborough?

Forsyth Yes, I can. I studied the poison register and checked all six entries against the prescriptions collected by Miss Mitchell and they all tallied.

Kersley And as a leading authority on the subject, would you now tell the court how many ampoules of Potassium Chloride it would take to cause a fatal heart attack?

Forsyth (hesitates) Four ampoules would be certain to cause cardiac arrest, but a fifth would leave no hope of survival.

Kersley And how would the victim die, Professor?

Forsyth In great pain, before the heart finally gave out.

Kersley But surely the post-mortem would reveal strong traces of Potassium Chloride that would cause the examining doctor to become suspicious?

Forsyth Unfortunately not. A heart attack causes an unusual amount of Potassium to be released into the bloodstream, which would be regarded as quite normal by any doctor conducting a post-mortem.

Kersley And Mr Sherwood would have been aware of this?

Forsyth A first-year medical student would have been aware of it.

Kersley Professor, what would be your opinion of a doctor who took advantage of such specialised knowledge?

Forsyth It betrays the very principles of the Hippocratic Oath, ‘Whatever house I enter, there will I go for the benefit of the sick, refraining from all wrong doing.’ The meaning could not be clearer.

Kersley No more questions, My Lord.

Judge Sir James. Do you wish to cross-examine?

Barrington Thank you, My Lord. Dr Forsyth.

Forsyth Professor.

Barrington I do apologise, Professor. May I begin by congratulating you on such an illustrious career, detailed so laboriously by my learned friend. But do you consider, as a scientist, you are also qualified to pass moral judgements on a colleague without relying on a shred of evidence?

Forsyth The Hippocratic Oath is the very foundation of a doctor’s code of practice.

Barrington And there is nothing in Mr Sherwood’s equally distinguished career to suggest that he doesn’t agree with you. So let us now consider the facts, Professor. You told the court that none of the doctors at St George’s gave you any reason to believe that Mrs Sherwood had died in unusual circumstances.

Forsyth That is correct, but none of them was aware that Mr Sherwood had been collecting ampoules of Potassium Chloride from a chemist outside London.

Barrington I will come to that, Professor. Now, in your long report commissioned by the Crown Prosecution Service, you also confirm (Holds up the report.) that Mrs Sherwood’s GP had her on the correct programme of medication for the particular heart problem she was suffering from?

Forsyth Yes, but Dr Haslam, was not …

Barrington I wonder, Professor, if you would be kind enough to confine yourself to answering my questions and not making speeches. This courtroom is not an extension of your lecture theatre and I am not one of your undergraduates. So allow me to move on to the constituents of Potassium Chloride and, may I say, Professor, how much we all enjoyed your little demonstration with the hypodermic needle, which you claimed was consistent with the amount of the chemical found on the kitchen glove.

Forsyth (now angry) It most certainly was.

Barrington But tell me, Professor, as an acknowledged expert on the subject, would it not also be consistent with the amount of Potassium found in this bottle of grapefruit juice, which is more likely to be located in a kitchen?

Forsyth Yes, but …

Barrington Search as I might, I couldn’t find any reference to grapefruit juice in your hundred-and-thirty-nine-page report.

Forsyth My report was not concerned with … the contents …

Barrington Then perhaps it should have been. Professor, you told the court that the first thing you did when you were asked to look into this case was to study Mrs Sherwood’s medical history.

Forsyth And I did so.

Barrington And so did I, Professor, and I discovered that Mrs Sherwood’s father had died of a heart attack at the age of fifty-eight. Why didn’t you consider this possible hereditary condition worthy of mention?

Forsyth Because I could find no connection between the death of a thirty-seven-year old woman and her father’s demise at fifty-eight. Had you been one of my undergraduates Sir James, you would have learnt that research is one thing, being able to draw scientific conclusions from it is quite another.

Barrington Well, let us consider some of your scientific conclusions, shall we, Professor, and try to find out what you have learnt from them. On how many occasions have you testified for the crown in murder trials where poisoning was involved?

Forsyth A dozen - more, perhaps.

Barrington And was one of those cases ‘The Crown versus Mr Roger Latham’?

Forsyth (embarrassed) Yes, it was.

Barrington And were you called by the prosecuting counsel as an expert witness?

Forsyth Yes, I was.

Barrington And was it your evidence that influenced the jury to return a verdict of guilty?

Kersley (leaps up) My Lord, is my learned friend questioning Professor Forsyth’s integrity?

Judge Are you, Sir James?

Barrington Certainly not. But I would refer your Lordship to the Judge’s summing up, and I quote, (He picks up a book and quotes from the trial.) ‘I find the evidence presented by Professor Forsyth as compelling, and feel it should weigh heavily with the jury when they come to consider their verdict.’

Judge In the judge’s summing up. I see. Please continue, Sir James.

Barrington Did you tell the court on that occasion that after you had carried out extensive laboratory tests, you were in no doubt that the liquid Mr Roger Latham poured into his brother’s coffee not only poisoned him, but was responsible for his premature death?

Forsyth That was my opinion at the time.

Barrington At the time. I see. And did another professor later prove that when the liquid was poured into hot coffee it was immediately neutralised and couldn’t have poisoned a mouse?

Forsyth Yes, but there was no way of knowing that then. It was some years later …

Barrington I was not suggesting, even for one moment, Professor, that you were culpable, only human, like the rest of us and therefore capable of making mistakes. Remind me, what verdict did the jury reach on that occasion?

Forsyth Guilty.

Barrington And did Mr Latham die in gaol, having served fourteen years of his life sentence?

Forsyth (nods) Yes, I believe he did.

Barrington And, two years after his death, did his family receive an unconditional pardon from the Home Secretary?

Forsyth (softly) Yes, but the antitoxic properties of that particular substance were not discovered until …

Barrington Until it was too late, Professor. But fortunately it is not too late in this case. Professor, you have already confirmed that the amount of Potassium Chloride found in Mrs Sherwood’s bloodstream was consistent with a heart attack.

Forsyth What I actually said was ….

Barrington Yes or no, Professor? It either was consistent with a heart attack or it wasn’t.

Forsyth (hesitates) Yes, it was.

Barrington Could someone with Mrs Sherwood’s medical history have suffered a heart attack, if she had been surprised by an intruder? Yes or no?

Forsyth Yes, it’s possible.

Barrington And are you aware of any other doctors who have prescriptions made up outside of the hospital they work in? Yes or no?

Forsyth Yes.

Barrington And could the amount of Potassium Chloride found on the rubber glove have been concentrated grapefruit juice? Yes or no?

Forsyth Yes, I suppose it could.

Barrington And if Potassium Chloride is taken in small doses, isn’t it harmless - and in certain cases even beneficial? Yes or no?

Forsyth Yes, but …

Barrington Shall we dispense with all these buts, Professor, and remove any doubt in the jury’s mind once and for all? I wonder, My Lord, if I might be shown exhibit twenty-six, the ampoule of Potassium Chloride that was found in Mr Sherwood’s bag, which Mr Hussein identified as coming from his shop.

Judge For what purpose, Sir James?

Barrington Like the distinguished professor, My Lord, I wish to conduct an experiment.

Judge I do hope you’re not wasting the court’s time, Sir James.

Barrington Heaven forbid, My Lord. I simply wish to prove my client’s innocence.

The Judge nods to the Usher who removes the ampoule from Sherwood’s bag and hands it over to Barrington, who breaks the ampoule and drinks it slowly.

Barrington A little dry for my taste, but as you can see, Professor, not fatal. So let us hope that once again it will not be your expert evidence who allows an innocent man to rot in gaol for the rest of his life.

Kersley My Lord, this goes far beyond the bounds of… legitimate cross-examination …

Judge You are quite right, Mr Kersley. Sir James, that comment was unforgivable, and I must insist that you withdraw it immediately.

Barrington (pauses) My Lord, I am unable to do so.

Judge And why is that, Sir James?

Barrington I was the defence counsel in The Crown versus Mr Roger Latham and I will go to my grave aware that my feeble advocacy failed to save the life of an innocent man. I am determined that it will not happen a second time. No further questions, My Lord.

The lights slowly dim and everyone’s eyes remain on Barrington. The curtain falls, but goes back up during the interval, to reveal the jury door back in place.

CURTAIN

Act Two

Scene One

The following morning.

The stage remains dark, but the audience can still see the jury room door. On the wall, the clock is showing 9.45 a.m. When the house lights dim, the Jury Bailiff steps through the door and addresses the audience.

Jury Bailiff Good Morning, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury and thank you for reporting back in good time. The second day of the trial will begin with Mr Kersley’s final witness, Ms Jennifer Mitchell, Ms Mitchell is the Crown’s principal witness, so I would not be surprised if she was in the witness box for most of the day.

Please continue to be vigilant when it comes to discussing this case with anyone not on the jury. If there are no questions, we should make our way back to Court Number One. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, please follow me.

The Jury Bailiff steps through the door, and when the lights come up, we are back in Court Number One, where we discover the barristers are talking among themselves while they await the entrance of the Judge and jury.

Ashton I’ve just bumped into Ms Mitchell as she was coming up the steps.

Kersley What’s she wearing?

Ashton Smartly tailored blue suit, very conservative, and virtually no make-up.

Kersley Good, that’s exactly the image I want fixed in the jury’s mind.

Ashton And I reminded her to refer to her father, Councillor Mitchell, as often as possible.

Kersley And under no circumstances to mention the reason she left St George’s at such short notice?

Ashton It was the last thing I emphasised.

Kersley Good. Then we can only hope that Sir James doesn’t know the real reason.

The attention moves across to Barrington and his junior, Jarvis.

Barrington And so we finally come up against their star witness.

Jarvis And how do we feel about that?

Barrington If Ms Mitchell is as innocent as Mr Kersley would have us believe, we’re in a lot of trouble.

Jarvis Surely not, after the roasting you gave Webster and Forsyth yesterday.

Barrington Yes, but try not to forget the doctor’s bag. Kersley made me feel like a pupil who’d just arrived in chambers, so if under his guidance Ms Mitchell proves a little too convincing, I may have to take the odd risk.

Jarvis What do you have in mind?

Barrington I might even consider asking the occasional question to which I do not know the answer. So if I put out my hand, (He makes a gesture.) make sure you pass me a blank sheet of paper.

Usher Be upstanding in the court. All persons having anything to do before my Lords, the Queen’s Justices, draw near and give your attendance. God save the Queen.

All rise as Mr Justice Cartwright enters and resumes his place. All bow and he returns the bow.

Usher Bring up the prisoner. (Sherwood enters the dock.)

Judge (to the audience) Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, good morning. Mr Kersley, you may call your next witness.

Kersley Thank you, My Lord. I call Jennifer Mitchell.

Usher Call Jennifer Mitchell. (A woman of thirty, attractive and dressed in smart suit, enters the witness box.)

Guard Jennifer Mitchell.

Usher Take the testament in your right hand and read from the card.

Mitchell (quietly) I swear by Almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Kersley Is your name Jennifer Alice Mitchell and are you presently working as a senior staff nurse at Wellingborough Cottage Hospital?

Mitchell Yes, I did.

Kersley Did you previously work at St George’s Hospital, Tooting?

Mitchell Yes, I did.

Kersley And was the consultant in charge of the cardiac unit the defendant, Mr Patrick Sherwood?

Mitchell (avoids looking at the dock) Yes, he was.

Judge Can you please speak up, Ms Mitchell, The jury (He waves a hand, sweeping the audience.) will need to hear every word you have to say. (Mitchell nods.)

Kersley When you first began working for Mr Sherwood, what were your responsibilities?

Mitchell I was a junior staff nurse attached to the cardiac unit.

Kersley And did Mr Sherwood ever ask you to carry out any duties not directly related to your work on the cardiac unit?

Mitchell Yes, a few months after I’d started working at St George’s, Mr Sherwood asked me to pick up a sedative for his wife from the hospital pharmacy, which I was happy to do.

Kersley Understandably. You would want to please your boss.

Judge Mr Kersley, that was both leading as well as an opinion. Do not further try my patience.

Kersley (facing the judge) I will attempt very hard not to do so, My Lord. (Turning back to Mitchell.) Ms Mitchell, did Mr Sherwood ask you to collect any other prescriptions from the hospital pharmacy?

Mitchell Yes, but that would be quite normal practice for any of the nurses.

Kersley But then one Friday evening he asked you to pick up a prescription from outside London?

Mitchell Yes, that was just before I was leaving to spend the weekend with my parents in Wellingborough and he instructed me not to have that prescription made up at the hospital pharmacy.

Sherwood I did no such thing - I’ve never asked you to pick up any of my prescriptions in Wellingborough.

Mitchell But you did tell me not to have them made up at St George’s.

Sherwood I most certainly did not…

Judge Mr Sherwood, you must not interrupt the witness while she is being questioned by counsel, now sit down (Sherwood reluctantly sits down). Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley Thank you, My Lord. Did Mr Sherwood give any explanation as to why you shouldn’t have the prescription made up at the hospital pharmacy?

Mitchell No, he just said that it was for a private patient.

Kersley Is that also normal practice?

Mitchell No, I had never been asked to do that before by any doctor.

Kersley Did you question Mr Sherwood about this?

Mitchell No one questioned Mr Sherwood about anything - not even Sister.

Kersley And was this prescription also for a sedative?

Mitchell No, it was for ten millilitres of Potassium Chloride.

Kersley Did he ever ask you to pick up any more ampoules of Potassium Chloride?

Mitchell Yes, he did. It must have been about two weeks later - also on a Friday evening, and he asked me to drop it back to his office on Monday morning.

Kersley And how many times did he ask you to have prescriptions for poison made up outside London?

Mitchell Half a dozen times during the next three months.

Kersley I apologise, Ms Mitchell, but I must now ask you an embarrassing question as I want the jury to understand fully why you became so willing to fall in with Mr Sherwood’s plans. During the time leading up to Mr Sherwood asking you to collect these prescriptions from Wellingborough, did he maintain a professional relationship with you?

Mitchell To begin with he did, but then he started to give me presents, send me flowers and even invited me out to dinner.

Kersley And did you accept any of these invitations?

Mitchell No, not immediately, but then he became more and more insistent, and it’s quite difficult for a junior nurse to go on refusing the senior consultant. So I finally gave in and agreed to have dinner with him at a restaurant in Fulham, where he assured me no one would recognise us.

Kersley So he chose the restaurant, but did you make the booking?

Mitchell No, he did. And he paid for the meal in cash - he explained that way it couldn’t be traced back to him.

Kersley And did he invite you out again?

Mitchell Oh, yes. After that, Patrick regularly invited me out for a meal, or to the theatre. He kept telling me how lonely he was. And then one night on the way home, he said he was falling in love with me.

Kersley What was your reaction?

Mitchell I was very flattered at the time, and when we arrived back at my flat he asked if he could come up for coffee.

Kersley And did you agree to his request?

Mitchell No, I made some excuse about having to be up early for morning rounds. I didn’t mind having dinner with him, but I wasn’t willing to begin a relationship with a married man, especially one who was working at the same hospital.

Kersley Quite understandably. But that later changed?

Mitchell Yes, it was a few weeks later, at the staff Christmas party - he pulled me under the mistletoe and started kissing me.

Kersley But isn’t that normal at a Christmas party, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell Yes, but it isn’t normal for a doctor to put a hand on your breast.

Kersley And how did you respond?

Mitchell I pushed him away and then left the party as quickly as possible, hoping that none of the other nurses had noticed.

Kersley And did you go straight home?

Mitchell I would have done so, but he followed me out. He apologised immediately and asked if he could walk me back to my flat.

Kersley Did you let him?

Mitchell Yes, I lived less than a mile away and he seemed very contrite.

Kersley And did he leave you once you arrived back at your flat, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell No, he asked if he could come in for coffee.

Kersley And did you agree this time?

Mitchell Yes, I’m afraid I did. You see, on the way home he never stopped telling me how much he adored me and longed to be with me. And in any case, it had started to rain and I felt rather sorry for him.

Kersley So after he’d joined you in the flat, what happened next?

Mitchell I made us some coffee, but he hung around long after he’d drunk it. I pointed out that it had stopped raining, but he just wouldn’t go.

Kersley And did he once again try to kiss you?

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Kersley Forgive me for being indelicate, Ms Mitchell, but how far did it go?

Mitchell (looks at the Judge) Do I have to answer that question, My Lord?

Judge Yes, indeed you do, Ms Mitchell. You see the jury need to know exactly what took place that night.

Mitchell (hesitates) We ended up making love.

Sherwood We’ve never made love and you know it.

Judge Mr Sherwood, I have already spoken to you about interrupting this witness.

Sherwood My Lord, do I have to sit in silence while this woman goes on telling lies about me?

Judge You must listen to all the witnesses without interrupting, Mr Sherwood. You will in time be given an opportunity to answer questions from the witness box under oath, if you choose so to do. But until then, you will remain silent. (Sherwood sits down.) Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley So, after Mr Sherwood had made love to you, did he eventually leave?

Mitchell Yes, it must have been about three in the morning.

Kersley And how did he treat you the following day?

Mitchell He was very courteous and professional during ward rounds, but that changed when he asked me to join him in his office.

Kersley Why, what happened, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell As soon as I walked in, he pulled me towards him and started to undo my uniform. I warned him that anyone might come in.

Kersley What did he say to that?

Mitchell He didn’t, he just smiled and locked the door.

Kersley And did he continue to try to undress you?

Mitchell Yes, we ended up making love on his couch.

Kersley And did this become a regular occurrence?

Mitchell Oh, yes. After that, Patrick would often turn up late at night, explaining that he told Elizabeth he was out visiting a patient. He made love with such a passion that I was convinced he no longer had a sexual relationship with his wife.

Kersley And how long did this affair go on for?

Mitchell About three months.

Kersley And he asked you to pick up the prescriptions from Wellingborough soon after you started sleeping with him?

Mitchell Within days. But by then Patrick knew only too well that I nearly always visited my parents at the weekend.

Kersley And were these prescriptions ever made out for Mrs Sherwood?

Mitchell No, they were all for private patients.

Kersley Can you recall the date of the first one?

Mitchell Yes. It was about three months before his wife died.

Kersley How can you be so sure?

Mitchell Because I made a diary entry that Patrick had given me a ten-pound note to cover the cost, and there was four pounds change, which I returned to him on the Monday morning.

Kersley But if you were so surprised to be asked to carry out Mr Sherwood’s instructions, why didn’t you report your misgivings to anyone in authority?

Mitchell Because by then I’d fallen in love with him.

Kersley And did he ever give any hint that he might have fallen in love with you?

Mitchell Oh, yes. Patrick regularly told me he was sick of his wife, and he couldn’t wait to be rid of her so he could spend the rest of his life with me. He hated the way she constantly belittled him in front of the staff. He even talked about moving out of Arcadia Mansions, finding a larger apartment and starting a family. I didn’t take it too seriously to begin with. But then one night he proposed.

Kersley He asked you to marry him?

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Kersley While his wife was still alive?

Mitchell Yes, it was after we’d made love - I’ll never forget it, because he left a few minutes later.

Kersley So would that have been around three in the morning?

Mitchell No, just after ten.

Kersley But you told the court that he usually left around three in the morning, so that no one would realise you were having an affair.

Mitchell Yes, but that night he told me he had to visit a patient in Westminster and he would come back later, which puzzled me.

Kersley Why did it puzzle you, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell Because he didn’t have his doctor’s bag with him.

Kersley And did he come back later?

Mitchell Yes, a few minutes after eleven.

Kersley And did you notice any change in him when he returned?

Mitchell Yes, he seemed very nervous. And when I asked if there was a problem, he told me that the patient had died.

Kersley He told you that the patient had died?

Mitchell Yes, I tried to calm him, but he just paced around the room mumbling to himself and then suddenly left without warning.

Kersley And did he ever raise the subject of marriage again?

Mitchell No. Once his wife had died, Patrick refused even to speak to me.

Kersley But this was the man who had regularly shared your bed and even asked you to be his wife.

Mitchell Yes. (Near to tears.) Which is why it came as such a terrible shock when he dropped me without any warning. Of course, relationships can come to an end, but that doesn’t mean you can’t remain on good terms.

Kersley But you did attend Mrs Sherwood’s funeral?

Mitchell Yes, but Patrick ignored me and didn’t even invite me back to his flat to join the other guests.

Kersley Was there anything else you can remember about the funeral?

Mitchell Yes, I was surprised that Mrs Sherwood was cremated and it made me anxious for the first time.

Kersley What were you anxious about?

Mitchell Well, I began to wonder if Patrick was making sure that no one could ever check what had caused the bruising on her arm.

Sherwood half rises, catches Judge’s eye and sits back down.

Barrington My Lord, this is a disgraceful slur on my client. There is absolutely no proof that…

Judge I agree, Sir James. The jury will disregard Ms Mitchell’s last statement. Ms Mitchell, this court is not interested in your opinions, only in facts. And Mr Kersley, you are as much to blame. You must have known only too well where that question was leading.

Kersley I did, My Lord, but then I considered Mrs Sherwood’s cremation to be a fact, and one the jury might even find relevant.

Judge Mr Kersley, you are bordering on impertinence. Stick to facts in future.

Kersley Ms Mitchell, is it a fact that while you continued working at St George’s Mr Sherwood began to threaten you?

Mitchell Yes, he did. When I raised the subject of the prescriptions he flew into a rage, warning me that if I mentioned them to anyone, not only would I lose my job at St George’s but he would personally make sure that no other hospital would ever employ me again.

Kersley So you decided to leave St George’s.

Mitchell I didn’t have a lot of choice, as he’d made it abundantly clear that I had no hope of promotion while he remained the head of department.

Kersley So what did you do next?

Mitchell I resigned and took a short holiday abroad. While I was away, a vacancy arose at Wellingborough Cottage Hospital for the position of senior staff nurse. I was delighted when they offered me the post and hoped this would be my chance to start a new life.

Kersley But that didn’t prove possible, did it, Ms Mitchell, because Mr Sherwood got in touch with you again. When was that?

Mitchell It must have been about a month after I’d started my new job. He began phoning me at the hospital.

Sherwood (rises) I never phoned you. I didn’t even know you’d got another job.

Judge Mr Sherwood, this is the last time I shall warn you. If you interrupt again, I will have you taken below as long as Ms Mitchell remains in the witness box. Do I make myself clear?

Sherwood Yes My Lord, but…

Barrington My Lord, may I be allowed to have a word with the defendant?

Judge For what purpose, Sir James?

Barrington To leave Mr Sherwood in no doubt of the harm it will do his cause if he is unable to hear all the evidence offered by this particular witness.

Judge Do you have any objection, Mr Kersley?

Kersley If it means I can continue uninterrupted, My Lord, I would welcome it. However, it may be that these unseemly outbursts, repeated by Mr Sherwood at regular intervals despite Your Lordship’s continual warnings, will only serve to shed light on the character of the accused and thus assist the jury when the time comes to consider their verdict.

Barrington My Lord, my learned friend can never resist making a speech and this one did indeed shed some light, if not on Mr Sherwood’s character, then on the Crown’s lack of any real evidence, which they try to cover up by resorting to personal abuse. However, I will have a word with my client My Lord, and warn him of the gravity of your words. (Barrington goes over to the dock.) Very good, but that was one more interruption than we agreed on, so don’t do it again. (Sherwood nods and sits back down, Barrington returns to his place.) I’m obliged, My Lord. I think Mr Sherwood now fully understands what is expected of him.

Judge Thank you, Sir James. Carry on, Mr Kersley.

Kersley You were telling us, Ms Mitchell, that Mr Sherwood telephoned you at the hospital - for what purpose?

Mitchell To warn me that the police had begun an investigation into his wife’s death and might want to question me about our relationship.

Kersley Really? Did he say anything else?

Mitchell Yes, he begged me not to mention the fact that I’d been with him on the night his wife died, as he had already come up with a more convincing alibi.

Kersley Why would he need another alibi, if he had been with you?

Mitchell Because he didn’t want the police to know that we’d been having an affair.

Kersley And how did you respond to this request?

Mitchell I told him to go to hell and rang off.

Kersley Did he call again that day?

Mitchell Yes, about an hour later, but I refused to speak to him.

Kersley How did you avoid it?

Mitchell I made some excuse to Sister about not feeling well, and went home early. But that night I was so distressed I just couldn’t get to sleep, so in the morning I told my parents everything.

Kersley And it was your father, Councillor Mitchell, who left you in no doubt as to where your responsibility lay?

Mitchell Yes. He advised me to tell the police everything I knew, otherwise I could be an accessory to the crime and just as guilty as he was.

Kersley And when the police got in touch with you, you immediately volunteered a statement?

Mitchell Yes, I did.

Kersley And has Mr Sherwood tried to contact you again since you made that statement?

Mitchell He never stops phoning, sometimes twice a day, but I haven’t spoken to him since that morning he rang the hospital. (Sherwood rises but then sits back down.)

Kersley And despite all that you’ve been put through these last six months, you still have no regrets about taking your father’s advice?

Mitchell None whatsoever. My only regret… (She hesitates.)

Kersley Yes, Ms Mitchell? Your only regret?

Mitchell (stares at Sherwood) … is that I ever agreed to collect those prescriptions for him in the first place.

Kersley No more questions, My Lord.

Judge Your witness, Sir James.

Barrington Thank you, My Lord. Allow me to begin, Ms Mitchell, with the subject of the prescriptions. Can I confirm that you were aware that Potassium Chloride was classified as a controlled drug?

Mitchell Yes, of course I was.

Barrington So you would have had to sign for them?

Mitchell Yes, I signed for all six of them, and as the prescriptions are in the court’s safe keeping, you can check for yourself.

Barrington I already have, from my photocopies. I just wanted you to confirm that it was your signature on the originals.

Usher shows her the originals.

Mitchell Yes, that is my signature.

Barrington Then perhaps you won’t mind writing your name on the Usher’s pad so that the jury can be left in no doubt. (She signs her signature with her left hand and the Usher shows the pad to Barrington.) Yes, there is no doubt it is your signature. (He checks the prescriptions.) You said in your statement to the police that Mr Sherwood only gave you those prescriptions on a Friday evening, just as you were about to leave for the weekend.

Mitchell Yes, that’s correct.

Barrington Then perhaps you can explain why, of the six prescriptions (Holds them up.) one is dated on a Tuesday, two on a Wednesday, two on a Thursday, leaving only one made out on a Friday, which was the one found in Mr Sherwood’s bag. (He places five of them to one side.)

Mitchell I said nothing about when they were made out, only when he handed them to me for collection and that was always on a Friday evening.

Barrington How convenient. Unless, of course, you held on to them until you went home for the weekend.

Mitchell Why should I do that?

Barrington Why indeed, unless, of course, you had your own reason for wanting to implicate Mr Sherwood, which brings me on to this mythical relationship you claim he began.

Mitchell It wasn’t mythical and he certainly began it.

Barrington You say he showered you with presents, sent you flowers, took you out to dinner - even occasionally to the theatre.

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Barrington Do you have any proof that these presents ever existed?

Mitchell No, of course I don’t. The flowers have died and I’ve eaten all the chocolates.

Barrington Now that is convenient. So you’re asking the court to believe that all these presents were in one way or another, how can I put this, biodegradable? And were these dinners always at restaurants where he wouldn’t be recognised?

Mitchell Yes, that was the idea. Patrick said it wouldn’t look good if we were seen together while his wife was still alive.

Barrington Can you name any of these restaurants?

Mitchell (considers this) Not off the top of my head, no. But then we never went back to the same one twice, although I do remember we once ate in Fulham.

Barrington And after you’d had dinner at these restaurants you can’t name, you would sometimes go on to the theatre?

Mitchell Yes, on at least two occasions.

Barrington So you must be able to name at least two of the plays?

Mitchell (hesitates) Not immediately. After all, it was over a year ago, but I remember one of them was by Tom Stoppard - and in any case I kept the programmes.

Kersley whispers to Ashton, who makes a note.

Barrington And after he’d taken you to the theatre, would he then drive you home?

Mitchell Yes, he always took me home.

Barrington And on one occasion he asked if he could join you for coffee?

Mitchell Yes, that’s right.

Barrington And until then, he hadn’t tried to do anything that could be described as improper?

Mitchell No, but two weeks later he grabbed me at the staff party and started kissing me under the mistletoe, and then he put his hand on my …

Barrington Quite. Where was the mistletoe hanging, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell (hesitates) From a light in the middle of the room.

Barrington From a light in the middle of the room. Let me see if I can picture this, Ms Mitchell. He had one hand on your breast, while at the same time trying to kiss you, in the middle of a crowded room, in front of all his colleagues - and your friends.

Mitchell Yes. It was very embarrassing.

Barrington Not embarrassing enough to stop you letting him take you home and then end up in bed with him.

Mitchell I felt sorry for him.

Barrington Ah, yes, I remember, it was raining. Have you any idea, Ms Mitchell, how unlikely this story is sounding?

Mitchell It’s the truth and he knows it.

Barrington Well, then let’s continue with this morality fable, shall we? The following morning Mr Sherwood called you into his office, locked the door and started trying to undo your uniform?

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Barrington And then he made love to you on his couch?

Mitchell Yes, just as I described it.

Barrington What time of day was that?

Mitchell I don’t remember exactly.

Barrington Well how about vaguely - eight o’clock, nine o’clock, ten o’clock?

Mitchell I think it must have been about nine thirty. Yes, it was just after we’d completed the early-morning rounds.

Barrington So you’re asking the court to believe that having left you, exhausted, at three in the morning, he then made love to you again at nine thirty?

Mitchell Yes, and I wasn’t the only nurse who’d been subjected to ‘after-rounds’ sex.

Barrington Strange, because I don’t see any of those nurses on the list of Crown witnesses.

Mitchell They didn’t want to know, once they realised the police were involved.

Barrington Strange how everybody and everything disappears whenever you’re involved. And after this romp on the couch, he regularly made love to you in his office and sometimes spent the night with you back at your flat?

Mitchell No, he never stayed the night. He always left around three in the morning. He didn’t want anyone to find out that we were having an affair.

Barrington And you say that this relationship went on for several weeks?

Mitchell Over three months.

Barrington And you would also have us believe that on one occasion, he asked you to marry him?

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Barrington Was this at a restaurant you can’t remember, or after a play you don’t recall?

Mitchell No, I remember the occasion well; it’s not something a girl is likely to forget. You see, he proposed to me on the night his wife died.

Barrington (sharply) How could you possibly have known it was the night his wife was going to die?

Mitchell Obviously I didn’t know until, the following morning. But I’ll never forget his words after we’d made love - ‘Elizabeth won’t be around for much longer, so we ought to start thinking about our future together.’

Barrington Elizabeth. Did you ever meet Mrs Sherwood?

Mitchell Only when she came to pick up her husband from the hospital.

Barrington So you never visited her at the flat?

Mitchell No, why should I do that?

Barrington To help her with her injections, perhaps?

Mitchell No, I’ve never been to Arcadia Mansions.

Barrington Arcadia Mansions. So it wasn’t you who was at the apartment when Mrs Sherwood said, ‘How did you get in?’

Mitchell No, I was at home all that evening.

Barrington Alone?

Mitchell No, Patrick joined me around eight o’clock. I cooked dinner for him and then we made love in front of the fire. Perhaps you’d like me to go into the details?

Barrington Yes, I would, Ms Mitchell, because if this relationship was as intimate as you say, you’ll be able to tell the court if Mr Sherwood has any scars, birth marks or even unusual habits that only someone who was so intimate with him would be aware of.

Mitchell (triumphantly) Yes, I can. Patrick has a small burn on his right arm (Touches her right forearm.) which you can only see when he takes his shirt off.

Barrington ‘A small burn on his right arm … Only when he takes his shirt off.’ (He writes down as a quote.) Anything else?

Mitchell (considers this) Yes, whenever he took me out on a date, he would remove his wedding ring and when we made love he would always insist on putting out the light. And, oh yes, his great passion is sailing. He keeps a small boat at Burnham, which he takes out most weekends.

Barrington One could hardly call this list of mundane trivia intimate knowledge. You know, Ms Mitchell, this is beginning to sound less and less like an affair and more and more like wishful thinking.

Mitchell I can assure you it was real.

Barrington I have no doubt you wanted it to be real.

Mitchell What do you mean by that?

Barrington Simply that no one was better placed than you to take advantage of a man who was nursing a dying wife. But he rejected your advances, which made you bitter and resentful. And then, after his wife died, you come up with this cock-and-bull story about Wellingborough, only too aware of how hard it would be for Mr Sherwood to prove his innocence.

Kersley My Lord, I think I must have fallen asleep, because the last thing I remember was my learned friend cross-examining this witness, and I seem to have woken up in the middle of his closing speech. Can your Lordship advise me, have I missed any significant questions?

Judge No, but you have improperly interrupted defence counsel, just as - I suspect - he was about to ask one. Please continue, Sir James.

Barrington If it is a question my learned friend demands, then a question he will get. My Lord, could Ms Mitchell be shown exhibit twenty-three?

Judge Yes, Usher. (He nods the Usher to hold up the glove.)

Barrington Ms Mitchell, do you know what this is?

Mitchell Yes, of course I do, it’s a rubber glove.

Barrington Used for hygienic purposes when administering an injection.

Mitchell Or for washing the dishes.

Barrington It was found on the floor of the Sherwoods’ kitchen the night his wife died.

Mitchell So what does that prove?

Barrington It’s a left-handed glove, Ms Mitchell - are you, by any chance, left-handed?

Mitchell No, I’m right-handed.

Barrington Strange, because when you signed your signature on the Usher’s pad only a few moments ago, you did so with your left hand. Would you care to try on the glove, Ms Mitchell?

Kersley My Lord, this is outrageous, it’s not Ms Mitchell who is on trial here.

Judge I agree, Mr Kersley. Sir James, your job is to defend Mr Sherwood, not to prosecute Ms Mitchell. Stick to your brief.

Barrington As you wish, My Lord. But I do hope my learned friend will not object to me asking Ms Mitchell about the phone calls she claims Mr Sherwood made to her after she had left St George’s.

Mitchell He did call me, again and again.

Barrington Again and again. Then how is it that BT are unable to trace a single call to Wellingborough Cottage Hospital from either Mr Sherwood’s office, his home or his mobile?

Mitchell He could have called me from a phone box.

Barrington Oh, I see, so several times a day he just popped out of the operating theatre to phone boxes all over London to plead with you to keep quiet about your affair.

Mitchell Yes, he did.

Barrington You know, Ms Mitchell, these calls are beginning to sound like the presents, the flowers, the restaurants and the theatre, absolutely no proof of anything actually taking place - which brings me on to the statement that you made to the police following Mrs Sherwood’s death.

Mitchell Yes, I made a voluntary statement to Chief Inspector Payne.

Barrington You did indeed, Ms Mitchell, but what I want to know is what you mean by the word voluntary? Was it an unsolicited statement? Did you, for example, visit a police station and offer to assist them with their enquiries?

Mitchell It wasn’t quite like that.

Barrington It wasn’t anything like that, was it, Ms Mitchell? The only reason you volunteered a statement was because your father, Councillor Mitchell, had warned you that if you didn’t, you might well be implicated yourself. And correct me if I’m wrong, you didn’t make that statement until after Chief Inspector Payne had contacted you some weeks later?

Mitchell I volunteered a statement immediately he contacted me.

Barrington Yes, but why didn’t you contact the police immediately following Mrs Sherwood’s death? Why leave it until Inspector Payne had got in touch with you?

Mitchell (voice rising) Because I didn’t have any proof. It would only have been my word against his.

Barrington At last we come down to the reality of this case - you didn’t have any proof. It’s simply your word against his. The truth is, Ms Mitchell, that your word isn’t worth the Usher’s pad it’s written on because there never was any relationship between you and the defendant.

Mitchell (breaking down sobbing) Yes, there was. We were lovers and he even asked me to be his wife.

Barrington Did you accept his proposal?

Mitchell Yes, I did.

Barrington So you must have been in love with him at the time?

Mitchell Yes, I was at the time.

Barrington So how do you feel about him now, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell I loathe him.

Barrington You loathe him?

Mitchell (voice rising) Yes, I loathe him. When he needed me, nothing was too much trouble for him, but once I’d served my purpose he dumped me as if I had never existed.

Barrington Try not to raise your voice too much, Ms Mitchell. Otherwise the jury might begin to suspect that…

Mitchell (still sobbing) I don’t care what they …

Kersley My Lord, I must object. Do these attacks on Ms Mitchell have any real purpose other than to intimidate?

Judge Do they, Sir James?

Barrington They most certainly do, My Lord, their purpose is to ensure that an innocent man doesn’t have to spend the rest of his life in gaol on the evidence of a jealous, vindictive woman who couldn’t get her own way. Ms Mitchell, if you are going to persist in claiming that Mr Sherwood seduced you, I must remind you, before you answer my next question, that you are still under oath. (He pauses.) Was Mr Sherwood the first person you had an affair with at St George’s? (Jarvis hands him blank sheet of paper that the audience can see is blank.)

Mitchell (hesitates) There may have been one other.

Barrington (stares down at blank sheet) Only one other, Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell Well, over a period of five years, perhaps two.

Barrington (continues to stare at sheet) Two?

Mitchell (she hesitates) Possibly three.

Barrington (slowly) Or four, or five, or …

Mitchell No - three.

Barrington And were any or all three of these paramours also doctors or surgeons, by any chance?

Mitchell Yes, but the first one was years ago and didn’t last that long.

Barrington Are you certain, of that Ms Mitchell?

Mitchell Yes, I am, but then I feel sure even you can remember when you lost your virginity, Sir James.

Barrington (continues to stare at the blank sheet of paper) But your second and third affairs lasted a considerably longer time, didn’t they?

Mitchell Yes, but they were over long before Patrick began courting me.

Barrington (voice rising) But isn’t it the truth, Ms Mitchell, that having failed to snare one doctor, you were willing to go to any lengths to catch another?

Mitchell No, that is not the truth. The truth is that Patrick told me that he loved me and asked me to be his wife, and I can prove it.

Barrington Like you can prove he gave you prescriptions only on a Friday evening, like you can prove that he showered you with presents that no longer exist, like you can prove which restaurants he took you to, but you can’t remember their names, like you can prove which theatres you attended, but can’t recall the titles of the plays, like you can prove he telephoned you again and again, but there’s no trace of any calls, like you can prove …

Mitchell That he made me pregnant. (Barrington is stopped in his tracks.) And when I told him I was going to have his baby, he begged me to have an abortion. (She looks defiantly at Sherwood.) And I only agreed to his demands because I wasn’t willing to give birth to the bastard of a murderer.

CURTAIN

Act Three

Scene One

The following day.

The Jury Bailiff walks through the door and addresses the audience. Clock shows 9.45.

Jury Bailiff Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. Today it is the turn of Sir James Barrington to take up the cudgels on behalf of the Defence. I am unable to give you any guidance as to the witnesses he intends to call (He glances at his clipboard.) as no names appear on the list. This, of course, may be a ruse by Sir James to keep the Prosecution guessing. Or it may simply be that following Ms Mitchell’s evidence yesterday, Sir James has not yet decided whether to put Mr Sherwood, in the witness box, where he would have to face cross-examination by Mr Kersley. It is, of course, not compulsory under English law for a defendant to take the stand. However, if he does not, inferences of guilt may be drawn. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, if you are ready, we will return to Court Number One.

He steps through the door; when the lights come up, we are back in Court Number One, Everyone is in place awaiting the Judge and jury.

Ashton Do you think he’ll put Sherwood in the box?

Kersley I wouldn’t. Always quit while you’re ahead.

Ashton You think he’s ahead, after all you achieved yesterday?

Kersley Yes, I do. A trial can be going your way and then suddenly one piece of evidence will derail you. Did you see the faces of the jury when they discovered that Ms Mitchell was left-handed. Doubt must have crept into their minds. No, we must hope that he puts Sherwood in the witness box. And if he does, I’ll need those two theatre programmes.

Ashton Ms Mitchell dropped them off in chambers this morning. They’re both in the envelope.

Kersley Good.

Barrington Have you had a chance to speak to our client this morning?

Jarvis He was consuming gallons of black coffee, wondering if you had come to a decision about putting him in the witness box.

Barrington I haven’t been left with a lot of choice after Mitchell’s revelation yesterday. It was a bad mistake on my part, Andrew. What did you learn from it?

Jarvis Not to ask one question too many.

Barrington A barrister’s worst nightmare. If I had stopped the moment she admitted to having affairs with three other doctors, the jury would not have been quite so sure about the rest of her evidence. Why in heaven’s name didn’t Sherwood tell us about the abortion in the first place?

Jarvis Perhaps he didn’t know himself and I have a feeling that Kersley was as surprised as we were.

Barrington Don’t you believe it. Kersley rehearsed her down to the last syllable.

Jarvis All the same, I thought he was impressive yesterday …

Barrington (He looks across at Kersley who is talking to Ashton) Yes he was, damn the man - but that was yesterday. We still have one piece of evidence that Kersley doesn’t know about. If he did, Mitchell would have revealed it, and that would have ended any chance of us winning this case.

Three knocks to announce the arrival of the Judge.

Usher Be upstanding in the court. All persons having anything to do before my Lords, the Queen’s Justices, draw near and give your attendance. God save the Queen.

The Judge enters and takes his place. All bow to the Judge who returns the bow.

Usher Bring up the prisoner.

Judge Sir James, are you ready to open the Defence case?

Barrington Yes, My Lord, I am. May it please your Lordship, Members of the Jury, I rose this morning with a heavy heart, only too aware of the responsibility that rests upon my shoulders. For it has been left for me to convince the Jury that Mr Sherwood, far from being consumed with murderous intent as Ms Mitchell would have us all believe, is in fact a simple decent man who has devoted his life to the service of others.

But Members of the Jury, for you to be convinced that this man is capable of murder, you have to ask yourself what was the motive, because all crimes must, in the end, have a motive. And, perhaps even more important, where is the evidence to convict Mr Sherwood? Because the evidence in this case has been at best circumstantial, and at worst, prejudicial.

Members of the Jury, English law does not demand that a defendant should appear in the witness box and it is right that it does not do so, but so determined is Mr Sherwood to clear his good name, that he is willing to face cross-examination and be judged by his peers.

My Lord, I call Mr Patrick Sherwood.

Usher Mr Sherwood

Kersley smiles as Sherwood leaves the dock, walks across the courtroom and enters the witness box.

Usher Please take the testament in your right hand and read from the card.

Sherwood I swear by Almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Barrington Your name is Patrick Hugh Sherwood and you reside at twenty-two Cadogan Villas in the county of London?

Sherwood Yes, I do.

Barrington You are presently a senior consultant, head of the Cardio Thoracic Unit at St George’s, and a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons?

Sherwood That is correct.

Barrington Your life-long hobby has been sailing and until the age of forty-five you were a surgeon captain in the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve?

Sherwood Yes, and I still keep a small boat at Burnham, which my wife … my late wife and I used to sail at weekends.

Barrington In 1982 you were called up as a reservist to serve in the Falklands, where you performed over a hundred operations in twenty-nine days.

Sherwood I have no idea how many operations I performed.

Barrington My Lord, over a hundred were the words mentioned in dispatches by the fleet commander. Now I’d like to begin, Mr Sherwood, with your relationship with your wife. How long were you married?

Sherwood Just over seventeen years.

Barrington And was your marriage a happy one?

Sherwood I adored Elizabeth; no one will ever be able to replace her.

Barrington When was it that you first discovered your wife had a heart problem?

Sherwood The first hint came in 1997, when Elizabeth complained of loss of breath, and of feeling pains in her chest, and left arm. These are the classic signs of a minor heart attack, so I took her into St George’s and carried out some routine tests.

Barrington And what did those tests reveal?

Sherwood That her heartbeat was irregular and she was suffering from an arrhythmia.

Barrington Did you consider this curable at the time?

Sherwood Oh, yes, I deal with this sort of problem every day, and as long as a patient is willing to be disciplined with their diet, sensible about taking exercise and, if it applies, give up smoking, then there’s no reason why they shouldn’t live to an old age.

Barrington So what did you do next?

Sherwood I put her on a programme of medication that was approved by her GP and confirmed by the brightest young specialist on my staff.

Barrington And once she had begun that programme, did her health start to improve?

Sherwood No, she continued to complain about loss of breath and feeling tired, which caused me to doubt my own diagnosis.

Barrington So what did you do about it?

Sherwood I got in touch with Sir Magdi Yacoub at the Brompton Hospital. He’s the leading authority in my field and I was keen to seek a second opinion.

Barrington And what was his judgement?

Sherwood He was puzzled. He could find no fault with my diagnosis and suggested that Elizabeth be put on a special fat-free diet.

Barrington And did you at last see some improvement?

Sherwood No, her health continued to deteriorate and during the last few months I couldn’t get her to leave the flat, even to go for a short walk.

Barrington And she finally collapsed on the evening of March the twenty-first 1999, and was taken into hospital, where she died of cardiac arrest a few hours later.

Sherwood (bows his head) Yes and I’ll never forgive myself for not being by her side.

Barrington Looking back over that last year, do you think you could have done any more?

Sherwood I ask myself the same question a hundred times every day, and I think I can honestly say that I did everything in my power to prolong Elizabeth’s life.

Barrington But the Crown would have us believe that over a period of three months, you instructed Ms Mitchell to pick up several ampoules of Potassium Chloride from a chemist in Wellingborough for the sole purpose of poisoning your wife.

Sherwood The Crown only has Ms Mitchell’s word for that.

Barrington But your signature is on all the prescriptions.

Sherwood And hundreds of others like it. Sir James, but it’s the first time I’ve been arrested and charged with murder.

Barrington Then why did you ask her to have them made up in Wellingborough?

Sherwood I didn’t - she could have collected those prescriptions from the hospital pharmacy whenever it suited her.

Barrington And now I would like to address the Crown’s suggestion that after your wife died, it was you who gave the instruction to have her body cremated. Is that true, Mr Sherwood?

Sherwood No. I’d been against the idea right from the start. If it hadn’t been for a codicil in Elizabeth’s will, she would have been buried in the family plot at Highgate cemetery. And if only she had been, I wouldn’t be standing in front of you today.

Barrington Quite so. Which brings me on to Ms Mitchell, and the one question on which this whole case rests. Whether you did, or did not, have an affair with this lady - for the purpose of using her as part of a well-thought-out plan to poison your wife. So let me ask you straight away, Mr Sherwood, what was your relationship with Ms Mitchell?

Sherwood Entirely professional. On the rare occasions we met outside the hospital, it would have been at gatherings where other members of staff were present.

Barrington Did you ever flirt with Ms Mitchell?

Sherwood I flirt with all the nurses in my department, Sir James.

Barrington You flirt with all the nurses in your department?

Sherwood When you work on a cardiac unit you come into contact with death every day, which naturally causes relationships to be quite intense. One’s moods swing from being morose to flippant and sometimes to just downright silly.

Barrington But Ms Mitchell claims that you gave her presents, sent her flowers, took her to restaurants and, on at least two occasions, accompanied her to the theatre?

Sherwood I think on one occasion I did pass on a box of chocolates to Ms Mitchell that had been given to me by a patient, but as for all her other suggestions, they are nothing more than fantasy.

Barrington She went on to tell the court that after having dinner together you would then drive her home. Is that also fantasy?

Sherwood It’s not only fantasy, Sir James, it’s simply not possible.

Barrington I’m not sure I understand, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood It’s quite hard to drive someone home when you don’t own a car.

Barrington But you could have borrowed a car from the hospital, even hired one.

Sherwood Yes, I could have done, if I had a driving licence.

Barrington You don’t have a driving licence?

Sherwood No and I’ve never had one. Elizabeth used to drive me everywhere.

Barrington But even if you didn’t drive Ms Mitchell home, she claimed that you regularly joined her in her flat for coffee.

Sherwood I never drink coffee, Sir James, gallons of tea, but never coffee.

Barrington I must now ask you about Ms Mitchell’s claims that you told her not to inform the police that you had been with her on the night your wife died, because you had come up with a more convincing alibi. How do you answer that charge?

Sherwood There is no need to answer it, Sir James, because I don’t even know where she lives.

Barrington But Mr Sherwood, you’re on trial for murder. Why not admit to having an affair, rather than risk going to prison for the rest of your life?

Sherwood Because we didn’t have an affair.

Barrington But you did go as far as kissing her on one occasion?

Sherwood Yes I did - it was at the staff Christmas party, I’d drunk a little too much, and regretted it immediately. I apologised and left soon afterwards.

Barrington So as far as you were concerned, that was an end of the matter?

Sherwood It would have been if I hadn’t asked her to come to my office the following morning.

Barrington Why did you do that?

Sherwood I wanted to apologise more formally.

Barrington And what was her reaction?

Sherwood She said there was no need to apologise as she had enjoyed it. She then locked the door and started to unbutton her uniform.

Barrington How did you react?

Sherwood I went straight to the door, unlocked it, held it open and waited for her to leave.

Barrington Did she do so?

Sherwood Yes, she did, but I’ll never forget her words as she stormed out of the room: ‘Mr Sherwood, you will live to regret this.’

Barrington What did you imagine she meant by that?

Sherwood I thought she might report me to the hospital board, even to an industrial tribunal.

Barrington And did she do so?

Sherwood No, she was far more devious than that. But even I couldn’t have imagined she would claim I was with her the night my wife died.

Barrington Where were you that night, Mr Sherwood?

Sherwood I was out on an emergency call visiting a patient in Westminster.

Barrington So why isn’t that patient in court today to verify your story?

Sherwood Because he died later that night.

Barrington And what was the time entered on the death certificate?

Sherwood 10.27 p.m.

Barrington And who signed that death certificate?

Sherwood I did.

Barrington So if it was signed at 10.27 p.m., you would not have needed a more convincing alibi, as Ms Mitchell suggested.

Sherwood Ms Mitchell seems to think I could have been in two places at once.

Barrington Quite. So finally, let me ask you, Mr Sherwood, how do you answer Ms Mitchell’s damning accusation that you used her as a courier over a period of three months, to collect ampoules of Potassium Chloride in order to poison your wife?

Sherwood Sir James, if I had wanted to poison my wife, I could have picked up any amount of drugs from the hospital pharmacy, without ever involving Ms Mitchell. No, the truth is that during that unhappy year I tended to my wife’s every need, often neglecting other patients. I only wish I’d been as successful with Elizabeth as I have been with some of them.

Barrington No further questions, My Lord.

Judge Do you wish to cross-examine, Mr Kersley?

Kersley I most certainly do, My Lord. Mr Sherwood, much as we enjoyed the description of your wedded bliss, I suspect the time has now come for all of us in this courtroom to return to the real world. Let me begin by asking you when you first met Ms Mitchell?

Sherwood It must have been when she was transferred to the cardiac unit.

Kersley And did you find her attractive?

Sherwood No, I didn’t think of her in that way.

Kersley So it wasn’t love at first sight?

Sherwood Or second sight, Mr Kersley.

Kersley So it was some time later that you fell under her spell?

Sherwood I never fell under her spell.

Kersley Ah. So she was correct in suggesting that you were the pursuer and she the pursued in this relationship?

Sherwood There never was a relationship, Mr Kersley.

Kersley I shall return to the proof of that relationship later, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood And I shall continue to deny it.

Kersley I’ll look forward to that. So let me turn to something you can’t deny. Where do you live?

Sherwood Twenty-two Cadogan Villas.

Kersley So when did you move out of your flat in Wimbledon?

Sherwood About a year ago.

Kersley And how much did it cost to purchase a penthouse in Chelsea?

Sherwood I don’t remember exactly.

Kersley Come, come, Mr Sherwood, I think every one of us knows exactly what we paid for the home we live in, especially if we bought it less than a year ago. I repeat, how much did it cost to purchase a penthouse in Chelsea?

Sherwood Around eight hundred thousand pounds.

Kersley Wouldn’t eight hundred and thirty-seven thousand be more accurate?

Sherwood Possibly.

Kersley So you must have won the lottery? Or did you inherit it?

Sherwood Neither. My wife left few assets in her will. By the time I had finished paying death duties I received less than twenty thousand pounds.

Kersley Well, that would just about cover the stamp duty on twenty-two Cadogan villas, so I must therefore ask you what the current salary is for a surgeon at St George’s?

Sherwood Just over ninety thousand pounds a year.

Kersley How many people earning ninety thousand pounds a year can afford to purchase a penthouse in Chelsea for eight hundred and thirty-seven thousand pounds? I feel sure you’re about to tell us that there’s another simple explanation.

Sherwood Yes, there is. Some years ago I took out a joint life insurance policy on my wife and myself.

Kersley Some years ago. Wouldn’t March 1997 be more precise?

Sherwood That is some years ago, Mr Kersley.

Kersley But it’s only some weeks before your wife suffered her first heart attack - ‘the first hint came in 1997, my wife complained of loss of breath, pains in her left arm and chest …’ - And what was the value of the policy?

Sherwood A million pounds.

Kersley One million pounds. And would I be right in thinking that the life insurance company are refusing to settle the amount until the result of this trial is known?

Barrington My Lord, that can only be speculation.

Judge I agree, Sir James. Mr Kersley, unless you can provide evidence, move on.

Kersley Mr Sherwood, has the life insurance company settled the full amount?

Judge Mr Kersley.

Kersley I apologise, My Lord. However, I do hope my learned friend will consider one million pounds a large enough sum to constitute the motive he was searching for.

Sherwood No amount of money would constitute a motive for harming my wife.

Kersley Is that right? Then why did you tell Ms Mitchel that you were sick of the way she continually belittled you in front of the hospital staff and how you longed to be rid of her?

Sherwood My Lord, do I have to answer such a ridiculous suggestion?

Judge Yes, I’m afraid you do, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood Of course I didn’t want to be rid of my wife. She was the only woman I’ve ever cared for.

Kersley Then why did you seek solace in the arms of another?

Sherwood I did no such thing.

Kersley So when Ms Mitchell informed the court that your wife had refused to make love to you for several years, was that also untrue?

Sherwood How could she possibly know?

Kersley Oh, I see, you regularly made love to your wife, did you, Mr Sherwood? (Sherwood hesitates.) Your silence speaks volumes and, more importantly, supplies us with yet another motive.

Sherwood It does no such thing. When will you work out that when it comes to my private life, Ms Mitchell simply made it up?

Kersley Well, then, let’s consider something Ms Mitchell couldn’t have made up - your wife’s desire to be cremated. Mr Sherwood, your wife’s will - was it written in her own hand?

Sherwood No, it was typed.

Kersley Typed by whom, may I ask?

Sherwood (hesitates) I think I may have typed it, but it was signed and duly witnessed.

Kersley So who witnessed the document?

Sherwood Mr Webster, the porter at Arcadia Mansions.

Kersley A man who - by his own admission - could neither read nor write.

Sherwood It wasn’t necessary for him to read or write, he was only witnessing my wife’s signature.

Kersley So just a few days before your wife dies she suddenly adds a codicil to her will stating that she wishes to be cremated. No doubt my learned friend will once again casually dismiss this piece of evidence as circumstantial and coincidental, rather than using his favourite words, ‘how convenient’.

Barrington My Lord, I’m enjoying this speech immensely, as I feel sure you are, but if it is to continue for much longer, perhaps my client might be allowed to sit down?

Kersley When I’ve finished, your client may well need to sit down. Mr Sherwood, you told the court that you consulted the eminent surgeon Sir Magdi Yacoub about your wife’s condition and he put her on a special fat-free diet.

Sherwood Sir Magdi has written to the court confirming as much.

Kersley But wasn’t that exactly what you were hoping to achieve, so that when your wife died, you would be able to show that she had been treated by the nation’s leading specialist and therefore no awkward questions would be asked?

Sherwood That’s ridiculous. How could I be expected to fool the leading authority in the land?

Kersley Because you neglected to inform him about the six ampoules of Potassium Chloride that later mysteriously disappeared. Or are you at last going to tell us what really happened to them?

Sherwood Mr Kersley, in a hospital as large as St George’s, thousands of drugs are dispensed every week. How could I be expected to account for every one of them the following day, let alone a year later?

Kersley Let alone a year later. So why don’t we turn to something you should be able to account for - even a year later - namely your actions on the night your wife died. Did you pour the glass of wine found by her side?

Sherwood Yes, I did, but that was before I left the flat.

Kersley So it must have been you who added the sedative that DCI Payne described as three times the normal dosage?

Sherwood No it was not. My wife was in the habit of taking sedatives, so it could have been a mistake.

Kersley Or part of your plan, like leaving the kitchen window open.

Sherwood Why should I do that?

Kersley So that you could return to your flat without being seen by the porter.

Sherwood How often do you have to be told? I didn’t return to the flat. I was visiting a patient.

Kersley In that case, why did you forget to take your doctor’s bag?

Sherwood I didn’t forget it.

Kersley But Mr Webster testified that he saw you leaving the building without it.

Sherwood Only moments ago you dismissed Mr Webster as unfit to witness my wife’s signature.

Kersley So are you now saying that you did have your doctor’s bag with you when you left Arcadia Mansions?

Sherwood You don’t need a doctor’s bag if all you have to do is sign a death certificate.

Kersley And you certainly wouldn’t have needed a doctor’s bag if you were visiting your mistress in Tooting, unless, of course, it was full of condoms.

Barrington (leaps up) My Lord …

Judge Yes, yes, Sir James. Mr Kersley, do try to remember that you are at the Old Bailey and not back in the House of Commons.

Kersley I do apologise, My Lord. So, wherever you were, Mr Sherwood - visiting a patient in Westminster without your doctor’s bag, or making love to your mistress in Tooting…

Sherwood I don’t have a mistress - in Tooting or anywhere else for that matter.

Kersley But Ms Mitchell told the court that after you made love, you left her at ten o’clock - without your doctor’s bag - and returned an hour later in a nervous state.

Sherwood I wasn’t in a nervous state.

Kersley Because you thought you’d got away with it.

Sherwood Because I wasn’t with her in the first place.

Kersley Then where were you at 10.27?

Sherwood I was in Westminster signing a death certificate and that certificate is in the court’s possession.

Kersley Indeed it is, but isn’t it common practice to fill in a death certificate the following day?

Sherwood Not in my department, it isn’t.

Kersley Then if it wasn’t you who returned to your flat, how do you explain your wife’s words - ‘How did you get in?’

Sherwood (pause) She could have been addressing Mr Webster.

Kersley But he walked in through the front door. I don’t think so, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood Then she must have been surprised by an intruder.

Kersley Rather familiar words for an intruder I would have thought. But singularly appropriate for a husband who had returned unexpectedly and not via the front door. ‘How did you get in?’

Sherwood But I didn’t return unexpectedly via any door.

Kersley Then via the fire escape, perhaps?

Sherwood Or the fire escape.

Kersley Then how about the kitchen window?

Sherwood Or the kitchen window.

Kersley Then who slipped back into the kitchen just before Mr Webster came in?

Sherwood It could have been the wind that caused the door to slam.

Kersley Then how do you explain the shouting, the quarrelling and the turning over of furniture?

Sherwood I accept Mr Webster’s explanation - that there had been another burglary.

Kersley So how did this burglar enter the building, when there was no sign of a break-in?

Sherwood Via the fire escape and the kitchen window.

Kersley But the window had been opened from the inside?

Sherwood My wife often opened it on a warm evening.

Kersley In March? Ah, I see, so it was your wife who let the burglar in?

Sherwood That’s a ridiculous suggestion, Mr Kersley, and you know it.

Kersley As ridiculous as suggesting that it was a burglar who caused the bruising on her arm.

Sherwood Not at all. The bruising could have been caused by a struggle with the burglar.

Kersley Rather than a struggle with you?

Sherwood Why should she be struggling with me?

Kersley Because when you returned to inject her, you were horrified to discover she hadn’t drunk the glass of wine that contained the sedative you had prepared for her.

Sherwood Then how do you explain the unopened ampoule left in my bag?

Kersley Because you left it there, Mr Sherwood, having only managed to inject five of the ampoules before you were interrupted by Mr Webster, when you fled to the kitchen, dropping the rubber glove on the floor.

Sherwood Have you forgotten that the glove belonged to my wife?

Kersley Have you forgotten that it was soaked in Potassium Chloride?

Sherwood From a bottle of grapefruit juice - as Professor Forsyth confirmed.

Kersley From an injection, that induced a heart attack, as Professor Forsyth demonstrated.

Sherwood The heart attack was probably caused by the intruder.

Kersley Re-enter the intruder, who conveniently appears whenever you’re in trouble. No, the truth is that there never was an intruder, Mr Sherwood, because it was you …

Barrington My Lord, I must object. My learned friend is putting words into the defendant’s mouth.

Judge I agree with you, Sir James. Mr Kersley, you must stop attempting to be the witness as well as prosecuting council. If I were to allow this to continue much longer, you might well end up being the judge as well.

Kersley As Your Lordship pleases.

Judge (furious) In future, Mr Kersley, allow the defendant to answer the questions and the jury to decide on the facts.

Kersley Is it a fact, Mr Sherwood, that you kissed Ms Mitchell at the staff Christmas party?

Sherwood (pause) Yes - I’ve already admitted to that.

Kersley And then you left the party a few minutes later?

Sherwood Yes, I did.

Kersley Did Ms Mitchell leave with you?

Sherwood No, she did not.

Kersley Several people were present at that party, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood I’m not saying she didn’t leave at the same time. I’m simply pointing out that she didn’t leave with me.

Kersley A nice distinction. But did you then offer to accompany her home?

Sherwood No, we went our separate ways.

Kersley Was it raining at the time?

Sherwood No, it began to rain later.

Kersley Just as you arrived back at her house?

Sherwood I’ve never been to her flat.

Kersley I didn’t say flat, Mr Sherwood, I said house.

Sherwood I’ve never been to her flat, her appartment or her house. I don’t even know where Oldfield Road is.

Kersley Oldfield Road? Who mentioned Oldfield Road?

Sherwood Ms Mitchel must have done when she gave her evidence.

Kersley I don’t think so, Mr Sherwood, she referred to Tooting, but she made no mention of Oldfield Road. I could always call for the court transcript, just to be sure.

Sherwood Then I must have seen it written on her file somewhere, but I have no idea where it is.

Kersley Do you know where your office is by any chance, Mr Sherwood?

Sherwood Yes, of course I do.

Kersley And did Ms Mitchell lie when she told the court you asked to see her in your office the following morning?

Sherwood No, I wanted to apologise more formally for what had happened at the staff Christmas party.

Kersley And her response was to unbutton her uniform?

Sherwood Yes, that’s exactly what she did.

Kersley Was that before or after you had locked the door?

Sherwood I didn’t lock the door.

Kersley So you didn’t have sex with her on the couch?

Sherwood Mr Kersley, I’m a surgeon not a film director.

Kersley So it’s pure fantasy for her to suggest that you regularly visited her flat in the early hours of the morning?

Sherwood I never visited her flat at any hour of the night or day.

Kersley And you never took her out for dinner or to the theatre?

Sherwood No, I did not.

Kersley Have you seen the play, The Real Thing.

Sherwood (pause) I may have done.

Kersley And whom did you see it with, Mr Sherwood?

Sherwood I don’t recall - probably my wife.

Kersley Yet another person who is conveniently unable to confirm or deny your story. So allow me to try to refresh your memory, because we are now in possession of the two programmes for the plays Ms Mitchell says you took her to see. (He holds up two programmes.) An Inspector Calls, and The Real Thing.

Sherwood That doesn’t prove I took Jennifer.

Kersley Jennifer. No it doesn’t, but you will recall that Ms Mitchell - I do apologise - Jennifer, was also in the habit of making notes in her diary, and that diary has been in the court’s safe keeping for several weeks. I wonder My Lord if you would allow the Usher to pass Ms Mitchell’s diary - exhibit four ~ across to Mr Sherwood.

Judge Yes. Usher. (Usher hands the diary to the defendant.)

Kersley Please turn to February the fifteenth, 1999 Mr Sherwood, and read to the court Jennifer’s entry for that evening.

Sherwood 7.30 The Real Thing.

Kersley Yes, but do read on, Mr Sherwood. Isn’t there another entry below that?

Sherwood (hesitates) P.S. at the Albery Theatre.

Kersley P.S. Patrick Sherwood, I suspect - unless, of course, Jennifer had an assignation with Peter Stringfellow.

Sherwood Post script seems more likely, Mr Kersley.

Kersley But she stated unequivocally that it was you.

Sherwood She also stated unequivocally that I drove her home when I don’t own a car or even have a driving licence.

Kersley No. No, Mr Sherwood, Ms Mitchell never claimed that you drove her home. Her exact words in reply to your learned counsel were, (Picks up a sheet of paper.) ‘He always took me home’ and if you would like her to explain what she meant by that, Mr Sherwood, we can always call her back as she would still be under oath.

Sherwood Why bother, when the oath means nothing to her?

Kersley Are you suggesting that Jennifer committed perjury?

Sherwood Your words, not mine, Mr Kersley.

Kersley But why should she do that?

Sherwood ‘Mr Sherwood, you will live to regret this.’

Kersley Your words, not hers - because there’s no proof she ever said them.

Sherwood Ask any doctor at St George’s and they’ll tell you about Ms Mitchell’s reputation.

Kersley What a gallant fellow you are, Mr Sherwood, which would explain why you dumped her the moment she’d served her purpose.

Sherwood You can’t dump someone with whom you’ve never had a relationship.

Kersley Wouldn’t you describe having an affair for three months as a relationship?

Sherwood Yes, I would, but I wouldn’t describe one drunken kiss as having an affair.

Kersley But if you weren’t having an affair with Jennifer, why would she bother to go to Wellingborough to pick up those drugs for you?

Sherwood She didn’t go to Wellingborough to pick up those drugs until after I’d thrown her out of my office.

Kersley Or was it after you’d had ‘after-rounds sex’ with her in your office?

Sherwood You’ve crawled back into the gutter, Mr Kersley.

Kersley I’m searching for you, Mr Sherwood.

Sherwood Then you won’t find me there.

Kersley But I will find you in your flat pouring your wife a glass of wine. How did you get in? And then adding a sedative. How did you get in? And then leaving without your doctor’s bag. How did you get in? And then returning via the fire escape. How did you get in? And then injecting her with five ampoules of Potassium Chloride. How did you get in? And then leaving her to die a slow, painful and terrible death.

Sherwood Nothing could be further from the truth.

Kersley I cannot think of a more accurate summing-up of your entire evidence. No more questions, My Lord.

Judge Sir James, do you wish to re-examine?

Barrington My Lord, it would be a travesty of justice were I not to do so. My learned friend has suggested that if the Jury conclude that Mr Sherwood did have an affair with Ms Mitchell, then they must dismiss the rest of his evidence as a tissue of lies. I now intend to prove beyond reasonable doubt that no such affair ever took place. But to do that I must return to your love of sailing, Mr Sherwood. When the Falklands armada was being assembled, were you called up to join the fleet?

Sherwood Yes, in 1982 I was still on the Reserve list.

Barrington And in what capacity were you asked to serve?

Sherwood As a surgeon captain to the fleet.

Barrington And to which ship were you assigned?

Sherwood HMS Sheffield.

Barrington And were you on board that gallant vessel when she was hit by an Exocet and went down in flames?

Sherwood Yes, I was, Sir James, and most fortunate to be among those who survived.

Barrington And while you were in the water, Mr Sherwood, were you burned - which would account for the small scar on your right forearm, which Ms Mitchell referred to as intimate knowledge only a lover could have been aware of?

Sherwood Yes, Ms Mitchell is quite right about the burn.

Barrington Would you show it to the jury? (Sherwood takes off his jacket and rolls up his sleeve to reveal a small burn.) Now, she would have seen that every day in the operating theatre?

Sherwood Yes and whenever I was scrubbing up.

Barrington And whenever you were making love?

Sherwood We never made love.

Barrington Because if you had done so, you would have taken your shirt off?

Sherwood Yes, I would.

Barrington Would you please turn round now Mr Sherwood? Would you please take you shirt off? (He does so, to reveal a large bum that almost covers his back.) ‘A small burn on his right arm … Only when he takes his shirt off!’ No more questions My Lord.

The lights fade as everyone stares at Sherwood’s back.

Scene Two

The following morning.

Jury Bailiff walks through the door and once again comes face to face with the audience. The clock shows 9.45 a.m.

Jury Bailiff Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, on what will be our last day together. When we return to the court in a few moments’ time, Mr Justice Cartwright will begin his summing up. He will only give you guidance on points of law. He will not offer an opinion on the case, as that is solely your prerogative. After he has completed his summing up, I will accompany you back here to the jury room, where I will leave you to consider your verdict. (The Jury Bailiff glances at the clock, which shows 9.50.) The time has come for us to make our way back to Court Number One. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, please follow me.

Jury Bailiff steps through the door, so thai when the lights come up we are back in Court Number One. Everyone is in place awaiting the Judge and jury.

Usher Be upstanding in the court. All persons having anything to do before my Lords, the Queen’s Justices, oyer and terminer, and general gaol delivery for the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, draw near and give your attendance. God save the Queen.

The Judge enters. When he is in place, they all bow and he returns their bow.

Judge Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. Having heard the arguments from both leading Counsel, it is now your solemn task to return a verdict as to whether Mr Patrick Sherwood be guilty or not guilty of murder.

Among the matters you will have to decide is did Mr Sherwood instruct Ms Mitchell to have six ampoules of Potassium Chloride made up outside London. Or was it compelling evidence - as Sir James suggested - that five out of the six prescriptions were not made out for a Friday - the day on which Ms Mitchell insists Mr Sherwood handed them over to her?

And then you will want to turn your attention to the open window leading to the Sherwoods’ fire escape, the rubber glove dropped on the kitchen floor, the wineglass found by Mrs Sherwood’s side and the doctor’s bag left by the telephone. Are they simply four red herrings, or do they point to something far more sinister? And remember that when it comes to reaching your final decision, you must deal only with facts.

Yes, it is a fact that the rubber glove was found to have a deposit of Potassium on it - but was it concentrated grapefruit juice? Yes, it is a fact that an excess of Temazepam was discovered in Mrs Sherwood’s wine - but who put it there? And at the same time, you will want to consider the victim’s words, ’How did you get in?’. Were they addressed to the porter, Mr Webster, as he entered the room, or to someone else who quickly disappeared into the kitchen?

Did Mr Sherwood return to the flat that night, in order to inject his wife with Potassium Chloride, or was he, as he claims, signing a death certificate in Westminster? You are in possession of that death certificate which unquestionably bears his signature and is timed at 10.27 p.m., but was it signed that night or later the following morning? Unfortunately, no one has come forward to verify either account, so only you can decide.

Which takes me on to the significance of a life insurance policy for one million pounds, taken out only weeks before Mrs Sherwood suffered her first heart attack. Did you find this a compelling motive for murder, or just another red herring?

Now we come to the most crucial question in this whole case. Did Ms Mitchell - as she vehemently insisted - have an affair with Mr Sherwood that lasted for several months, or are you persuaded that, having been rejected by him, she made the whole story up? Were you affected by the fact that he obviously knew where she lived or were you more struck by seeing the scar on his back? Although you will recall Ms Mitchell told us that whenever they made love Mr Sherwood insisted that the lights were out. You have been able to observe both of them in the witness box, so you can draw your own conclusions as to which one you feel was telling the truth. For certainly, one of them is a brazen liar.

If you decide it was Ms Mitchell who was being deceitful about her relationship with Mr Sherwood, then you have every right to be sceptical about the rest of her evidence. But if, on the other hand, you are convinced she did have an affair with the accused, then you might feel that verifies the rest of her story.

And so the time has now come for you to return to the jury room and consider your verdict. If, when you have completed your deliberations, you feel the Defence have made their case, then it is your duty to return a verdict of Not Guilty. But, if you believe the Prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, then it is nothing less than your duty to deliver a verdict of Guilty.

May God guide and assist you in your counsels.

Lights dim in the court. Jury Bailiff steps through the jury door, into spot, as house lights go up.

Jury Bailiff Members of the Jury, the time has come for you to make your decision, but do not do so until I instruct you.

It is your task to decide whether you believe Mr Patrick Sherwood is guilty or not guilty of the murder of Elizabeth Sherwood.

I will leave you for a few moments to talk among yourselves and consider your verdict. (He leaves the stage for 30 seconds.)

Usher Silence in Court.

Jury Bailiff Please take the monitor from the back of the seat in front of you, and register your verdict, guilty or not guilty, now.

Pause while the audience place their vote. This can be done with cards or a show of hands.

Jury Bailiff Thank you, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. We will now return to the court, in order that your verdict may be known.

Jury Bailiff exits through the jury room doors, which split apart.

VERDIGT

IF THE AUDIENCE DELIVERS THE VERDICT NOT GUILTY:

Usher Silence in court. Bring up the prisoner.

Sherwood returns to the dock.

Judge Will the foreman please rise. Mr Foreman, have you reached a verdict?

Foreman (on tape, or from the body of the audience) Yes, we have, My Lord.

Judge Do you find the prisoner at the bar, Patrick Hugh Sherwood, guilty or not guilty of the murder of Elizabeth Sherwood?

Foreman Not guilty.

Judge (turns to face the defendant in the dock) Patrick Hugh Sherwood, you have been found not guilty of the charges laid before you and I therefore discharge you. You are free to leave the court.

Sherwood comes down from the dock and shakes hands with Barrington and Jarvis.

Barrington Congratulations.

Sherwood Thank you.

Jarvis Well done.

Sherwood Thank you both. But Sir James, may I ask you a question?

Barrington Yes, of course.

Sherwood Am I right in thinking that when a verdict of not guilty has been reached, there can never be a retrial?

Barrington That is correct. In English law, once a jury has acquitted a defendant he cannot be put on trial again for the same offence.

Sherwood (smiles) That’s a relief.

Jarvis So tell me, Mr Sherwood, how do you intend to celebrate your great victory?

Sherwood I shall go back to work, Mr Jarvis, just as Sir James predicted I would.

The attention moves to Kersley and Ashton, who are chatting on the other side of the stage.

Ashton I have a feeling it must have been a close-run thing, so what do you imagine tipped the balance?

Kersley The burn on his back, would be my guess. Pity Ms Mitchell didn’t stay to hear his evidence. I would like to have seen her face when the good doctor took off his shirt.

Ashton Perhaps the reality is as Sir James suggests, that having been rejected by Mr Sherwood she was simply seeking revenge.

Kersley I’m not convinced it’s quite that simple. There’s something about this case that doesn’t ring true.

Ashton In what way?

Kersley (they start to leave the stage) Well, to start with, why didn’t Mitchell return to hear the verdict?

As they depart the Jury Bailiff walks quickly back on, as Sherwood is leaving.

Jury Bailiff Sir, sir. Can I suggest that you stay put for a few more minutes, as there is rather a large crowd gathering on the pavement outside. And once the corridors have been cleared, we can slip you out the back way.

Sherwood That’s most thoughtful of you, Mr Pierce, but I’m quite happy to leave by the front. I’ve nothing to hide.

Jury Bailiff No, of course you haven’t, Mr Sherwood indeed, if I may say so, sir, I never doubted for a moment that you were innocent. By the way, the woman Mitchell is hanging around in the corridor trying to get back in, but I didn’t…

Sherwood No, that’s fine, I’m only too happy to see her.

Mitchell runs on to the stage and the Jury Bailiff exits.

Mitchell I booked a table for us at the Caprice. No need to hide in Fulham any longer.

Sherwood You were always that confident of the verdict?

Mitchell Of course. Once the jury had seen that scar on your back they were never going to believe that I had slept with you and to quote Mr Kersley, ‘A jury that has doubts will never send a man to gaol for the rest of his life.’

Sherwood You were brilliant in the witness box, in fact, Sir James only got the better of you once.

Mitchell And when was that?

Sherwood When he tricked you into writing your signature on the Usher’s notepad, to show that you’d lied when you claimed you were right-handed.

Mitchell But I am right-handed. I worked out exactly what Sir James was up to and realised that the image of me signing that pad with my left hand would remain fixed in the jury’s minds.

Sherwood Then why didn’t you try on the rubber glove?

Mitchell I did, at the police station, and I just couldn’t get it on, Elizabeth must have had very small hands.

Sherwood You thought of everything.

Mitchell Yes, and if only Webster hadn’t walked in just before I’ finished injecting her we could have been married a year ago.

Sherwood No, I’m afraid not, Jennifer. You see that was something else Mr Kersley was right about… I never intended to marry you in the first place. (He turns to walk away as the lights fade.)

CURTAIN

IF THE AUDIENCE DELIVERS THE VERDICT GUILTY:

Usher Silence in court. Bring up the prisoner.

Sherwood returns to the dock.

Judge Will the foreman please rise. Mr Foreman, have you reached a verdict?

Foreman Yes, we have, My Lord.

Judge Do you find the prisoner at the bar, Patrick Hugh Sherwood, guilty or not guilty of the murder of Elizabeth Sherwood?

Foreman Guilty.

The Judge turns to face the prisoner in the dock.

Judge Patrick Hugh Sherwood, you stand convicted of murder by a jury of your peers. You undoubtedly poisoned your young wife, taking advantage of your special knowledge and training, and in so doing dishonoured your profession. You murdered Elizabeth Sherwood in order to be rid of her and inherit a milion pounds. As the law requires, I sentence you to life imprisonment, with the recommendation that you serve a minimum of seventeen years. You may be curious, Mr Sherwood, to discover why I have recommended this particular sentence. Seventeen years is the period of time that was left on the life insurance policy, the profits of which you had planned to enjoy by spending the rest of your life in the luxury of a penthouse apartment in Chelsea with money to spare. You will instead spend those seventeen years in custody at Her Majesty’s pleasure, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Sherwood’s head drops into his hand. The attention moves to Barrington and Jarvis.

Barrington God help the poor man.

Jarvis What do you imagine tipped the balance? It must have been a close-run thing.

Barrington We’ll never know, but it can’t have helped that we couldn’t explain why he’d left his bag behind, when he went on insisting that he was with a patient in Westminster.

Jarvis (nods) I know it’s the jury’s responsibility to decide the verdict, not ours, but I’m still not sure if the man is guilty.

Barrington Neither am I. (Watches as Mitchell enters the courtroom and stares at Sherwood.) But I have a feeling that woman is the one person who knows the answer to your question.

Guard approaches the dock, motions Sherwood to follow him. They walk halfway across the stage.

Ashton Well, at least this time you beat the old buzzard.

Kersley Did I? (Stares at Barrington.) I’m not so sure. There’s something about this case that doesn’t ring true.

Ashton In what way?

Kersley Nothing I can prove, but I have a feeling we would discover what really took place on the night on March the twenty-first if we could only overhear …

Sherwood leaves the witness box and begins to walk across the stage.

Guard Wait there. (He goes over to another Guard who completes the paperwork, as Mitchell walks up behind Sherwood.)

Sherwood You know I didn’t kill Elizabeth.

Mitchell Of course I do, but no one is ever going to believe that when you left my flat to go to Westminster and sign that death certificate it was me who went to Arcadia Mansions.

Sherwood How did you get in?

Mitchell Via the fire escape and the kitchen window, and if Webster hadn’t interrupted me I would have managed all six ampoules … ironic when you think about it. If you’d admitted to having an affair, you would have had the perfect alibi, but then, Patrick, I did warn you, you will live to regret this.

CURTAIN

Bloomsbury Methuen Drama

An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc

50 Bedford Square

1385 Broadway

London

New York

WC1B 3DP

NY 10018

UK

USA

www.bloomsbury.com

Bloomsbury is a registered trade mark of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc

First published in 2000 by Methuen Publishing Limited

© 2000 Jeffrey Archer

Jeffrey Archer has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and

Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or

transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including

photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system,

without prior permission in writing from the publishers.

No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting

on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication

can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the author.

All rights whatsoever in this play are strictly reserved and application for

performance etc. should be made before rehearsals by professionals and by

amateurs to Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 50 Bedford Square, London,

WC1B 3DP. No performance may be given unless a licence has been obtained.

No rights in incidental music or songs contained in the work are hereby

granted and performance rights for any performance/presentation whatsoever

must be obtained from the respective copyright owners.

Visit www.bloomsbury.com to find out more about our authors and their books

You will find extracts, author interviews, author events and you can sign up for

newsletters to be the first to hear about our latest releases and special offers.

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

eISBN-13: 978-1-4725-3650-1

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress.

Table of Contents

Cover Page

Title Page

Contents

Act One

Scene One

Scene Two

Act Two

Scene One

Act Three

Scene One

Scene Two

Imprint Page